trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Propylene glycol and glycerin form formaldehyde and acetaldehyde when vaporized
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
6 sources for · 0 against

Multiple studies demonstrate that propylene glycol and vegetable glycerin thermally degrade during vaporization to form toxic aldehydes, specifically including formaldehyde and acetaldehyde.

Evidence for · 6
2025 · cited by 4
Identifies formaldehyde and acetaldehyde among the thermal degradation byproducts generated by PG and VG in e-cigarette aerosols.
See more details
The analysis

Every retrieved paper examining the thermal degradation or emissions of propylene glycol and glycerin (glycerol) in electronic delivery systems reports the formation of formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and other toxic carbonyls. The evidence is unanimous and robust, supporting the claim entirely.

More for · 5
2017 · cited by 0
Notes that thermal decomposition of propylene glycol and vegetable glycerin produces reactive carbonyls including formaldehyde and acetaldehyde.
2020 · cited by 0
States that 1,2-propylene glycol and glycerin, as principal components of e-liquids, thermally degrade to form acetaldehyde and formaldehyde when heated.
2021 · cited by 0
Demonstrates through nuclear magnetic resonance that the degradation of e-system liquids generates formaldehyde and acetaldehyde.
2021 · cited by 0
Confirms that PG and VG emitted significant levels of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde during vaping emissions.
2016 · cited by 0
Reports that toxic aldehydes including formaldehyde and acetaldehyde originate from the heating of base e-liquid solvents like PG and glycerin.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7904 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt