trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Propositional knowledge and acquaintance knowledge are distinct epistemological categories.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
5 sources for · 0 against

Reference works and philosophical literature explicitly distinguish between propositional knowledge and knowledge by acquaintance as separate types or categories of knowledge.

Evidence for · 5
2024 · cited by 6
Abstract What is it to know someone? Epistemologists rarely take up this question, though recent developments make such inquiry possible and desirable. This paper advances an account of how such interpersonal knowledge goes beyond mere propositional and qualitative knowledge about someone, giving a central place to second‐personal treatment. It examines what such knowledge requires, and what makes it distinctive within epistemology as well as socially. It assesses its theoretic value for several issues in moral psychology, epistemic injustice, and philosophy of mind. And it offers an account of the complex content in play if interpersonal knowledge is to be understood in terms of its mental states and their functions.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:for=3+1p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

More for · 4
1999 · cited by 0
Health visiting is a practical discipline, hence knowledge in health visiting practice cannot be thought of as inert, that is merely as items of information merely; rather, it must be thought of in terms of a dynamic interplay among the individuality of the knower (the practitioner), the sources whereby knowledge may be acquired, and the contexts in which it must be applied. This discussion is an exploration of that interplay. Thus, in the discussion, the distinctive demands on the practitioner (and the kinds of personal qualities these entail) in acquiring and applying knowledge are highlighted, as are the sources of knowledge and the constraints of context. Three sources of knowledge are noted: authority, personal experience, and intuition. Context is conceived both in terms of the macro, sociopolitical, level and in terms of the micro level, i.e. the individual homes and interpersonal relationships in and through which health visiting is typically practised. Conclusions are drawn relating to the education of health visitors. The discussion draws on a distinction between three kinds of knowledge: factual or propositional knowledge, knowledge by acquaintance, and practical knowledge, or know-how.
cited by 0
origin, and limits of knowledge. Also called the theory of knowledge, it explores different types of knowledge, such as propositional knowledge about facts Epistemology is the branch of philosophy that examines the nature, origin, and limits of knowledge. Also called the theory of knowledge, it explores different types of knowledge, such as propositional knowledge about facts, practical knowledge in the form of skills, and knowledge by acquaintance as a familiarity through experience. Epistemologists study the concepts of belief, truth, and justifica The…
cited by 0
These cases suggest someone can have a belief that is true and has reasons behind it, but still not really have knowledge. Because of this, other ideas like reliabilism (trusting reliable ways of knowing) and virtue epistemology (focusing on intellectual character) were developed to better explain what knowledge really is.[2] There are different kinds of knowledge. Propositional knowledge is “knowing that” something is true, like knowing that water boils at 100°C.[3] Procedural knowledge is “knowing how” to do something, like solving a puzzle or coding.[4] Experiential knowledge is “knowing by experience,” like recognizing a friend’s voice or knowing how a certain food tastes.[5] Each of these kinds uses different parts of the brain and different types of thinking. The study of knowledge is called epistemology.
2021 · cited by 0
Abstract More basic than the authors' distinction between knowing and believing is a distinction between knowledge-by-acquaintance (I know John Smith) and propositional knowledge/belief (I know/believe that John Smith lives in Durham). This distinction provides a better account of both the comparative and developmental data.
Everything we examined (5) — 4 independent sources
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Knowledge in health visiting practice.peer-reviewedno side taken
  2. Epistemologyreferencesame source L3no side taken
  3. The epistemology of interpersonal relationspeer-reviewedno side taken
  4. Simple English Wikipedia: Knowledgereferencesame source L3no side taken
  5. Knowledge-by-acquaintance before propositional knowledge/beliefpeer-reviewedno side taken
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt