Australia is an agricultural nation characterised by one of the most naturally diverse climates in the world, which translates into significant sources of risk for agricultural production and subsequent farm revenues. Extreme climatic events have been significantly affecting large parts of Australia in recent decades, contributing to an increase in the vulnerability of crops, and leading to subsequent higher risk to a large number of agricultural producers. However, attempts at better managing climate related risks in the agricultural sector have confronted many challenges. First, crop insurance products, including classical claim-based and index-based insurance, are among the financial implements that allow exposed individuals to pool resources to spread their risk. The classical claim-based insurance indemnifies according to a claim of crop loss from the insured customer, and so can easily manage idiosyncratic risk, which is the case where the loss occurs independently.Nevertheless, the existence of systemic weather risk (covariate risk), which is the spread of extreme events over locations and times (e.g., droughts and floods), has been identified as the main reason for the failure of private insurance markets, such as the classical multi-peril crop insurance, for agricultural crops. The index-based insurance is appropriate to handle systemic but not idiosyncratic risk. The indemnity payments of the index-based insurance are triggered by a predefined threshold of an index (e.g., rainfall), which is related to such losses. Since the covariate nature of a climatic event, it sanctions the insurers to predict losses and ascertain indemnifications for a huge number of insured customers across a wide geographical area. However, basis risk, which is related to the strength of the relationship between the predefined indices used to estimate the average loss by the insured community and the actual loss of insured assets by an individual, is a major barrier that hinders uptake of the index-based insurance. Clearly, the high basis risk, which is a weak relationship between the index and loss, destroys the willingness of potential customers to purchase this insurance product. Second, the impact of multiple synoptic-scale climate mode indices (e.g., Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) and Indian Ocean Index (IOD)) on precipitation and crop yield is not identical in different spatial locations and at different times or seasons across the Australian continent since the influence of large-scale climate heterogeneous over the different regions. The occurrence, role, and amplitude of synoptic-scale climate modes contributing to the variability of seasonal crop production have shifted in recent decades. These variables generally complicate the climate and crop yield relationship that cannot be captured by traditional modelling and analysis approaches commonly found in published agronomic literature such as linear regression. In addition, the traditional linear analysis is not able to model the nonlinear and asymmetric interdependence between extreme insurance losses, which may occur in the case of systemic risk. Relying on the linear method may lead to the problem that different behaviour may be observed from joint distributions, particularly in the upper and lower regions, with the same correlation coefficient. As a result, the likelihood of extreme insurance losses can be underestimated or overestimated that lead to inaccuracies in the pricing of insurance policies. Another alternative is the use of the multivariate normal distribution, where the joint distribution is uniquely defined using the marginal distributions of variables and their correlation matrix. However, phenomena are not always normally distributed in practice. It is therefore important to develop new, scientifically verified, strategic measures to solve the challenges as mentioned above in order to support mitigating the influences of the climate-related risk in the a