trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Pitch and intensity are distinct acoustic properties of sound.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
9 sources for · 0 against

Pitch and intensity are universally recognized in acoustics and psychoacoustics as separate properties of sound, corresponding respectively to perceived frequency and loudness.

Evidence for · 9
1989 · cited by 0
Treats interaural time and intensity differences as separate cues, implying distinct properties.
See more details
How claims like this are judged

Judged against reference works: claims of this kind are settled by reference works, not journal abstracts.

More for · 8
1990 · cited by 0
Explicitly distinguishes between fundamental frequency, pitch, and other properties as separate sound attributes.
1988 · cited by 0
Distinguishes between sound intensity (loudness) and frequency as basic features of sound.
2017 · cited by 0
Analyzes pitch and intensity as separate acoustic features/predictors in laughter.
2022 · cited by 0
Lists pitch, duration, intensity, and spectrum as distinct intrinsic characteristics of sound.
2024 · cited by 0
Identifies pitch, timbre, and loudness as distinct perceptual properties dependent on acoustic cues.
2025 · cited by 0
Differentiates pitch height, spectral energy, and vocal intensity as distinct acoustic features.
2023 · cited by 0
Lists pitch, intensity, and duration as distinct factors involved in word stress.
2013 · cited by 0
Measures duration, pitch, and intensity separately as prosodic/acoustic cues.
Everything we examined (28)
  1. Wikipedia: Acousticsreferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  2. Academic Press: An introduction to the psychology of hearingreferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  3. Academic Press: An introduction to the psychology of hearingreferencesupports
  4. MIT Press: Auditory scene analysis : the perceptual organization of soundreferencesupports
  5. MIT Press: How language comes to children : from birth to two yearsreferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  6. MIT Press: How language comes to children : from birth to two yearsreferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  7. Academic Press: Hearing science and hearing disordersreferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  8. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers: Speech communications : human and machinereferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  9. Birkhäuser: Sensory systemsreferencesupports
  10. Wikisource: Popular Science Monthly/Volume 21/August 1882/Acoustic Architecturereferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  11. Wikisource: Popular Science Monthly/Volume 19/July 1881/Production of Sound by Radiant Energy IIreferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  12. Wikisource: Popular Science Monthly/Volume 19/June 1881/Production of Sound by Radiant Energy Ireferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  13. PLoS ONE: Towards a social functional account of laughter: Acoustic features convey reward, affiliation, and dominance.peer-reviewedsupports
  14. Frontiers in Communication: The Speech Surrogacy Systems of the Yoruba Dùndún and Bàtá Drums. On the Interface Between Organology and Phonologypeer-reviewedsupports
  15. OpenAIRE: Processes of auditory organization during music listeningpeer-reviewedsupports
  16. OpenAIRE: Acoustic Features of Emotional Expression in Preverbal Infant Vocalizationspeer-reviewedsupports
  17. OpenAIRE: Towards a social functional account of laughter: Acoustic features convey reward, affiliation, and dominancepeer-reviewedsupports
  18. OpenAIRE: When a “wheeze” is not a wheeze: acoustic analysis of breath sounds in infantspeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  19. OpenAIRE: THE WORD STRESS OF UZBEK, KARAKALPAK AND ENGLISH LANGUAGEpeer-reviewedsupports
  20. OpenAIRE: Prosody and syntactic structures in continuous speech in Frenchpeer-reviewedsupports
  21. NASA Technical Reports Server: Microstructure-derived macroscopic residual resistance of brominated graphite fibersprimary-datano side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  22. NASA Technical Reports Server: Electron energy distribution produced by beam-plasma dischargeprimary-datano side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  23. NASA Technical Reports Server: Energetic and magnetosheath energy particle signatures of the low-latitude boundary layer at low altitudes near noonprimary-datano side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  24. OSTI: S&TR June 2026_Predicting Tsunamispeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  25. Wind Energy Science: Condition Monitoring of Wind Turbine Drivetrains: State-of-the-Art Technologies, Recent Trends, and Future Outlookpeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  26. OSTI: High-Resolution Sampling of a River Plume Front with Uncrewed Underwater and Aerial Vehiclespeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  27. Physical Review. X: Anisotropic Thermal Transport in Quasi-2D Ruddlesden-Popper Hybrid Perovskite Superlatticespeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  28. Proceedings of the IEEE: Survey of Deep Learning and Physics-Based Approaches in Computational Wave Imagingpeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7505 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt