trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Photochemical rearrangement of 4,4-diphenylcyclohexa-2,5-dien-1-one proceeds via a bicyclo[3.1.0]hexenyl intermediate.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Chemical literature and mechanistic analysis describe how the photochemical rearrangement of 4,4-diphenylcyclohexa-2,5-dien-1-one proceeds via cyclopropane intermediates leading to a bicyclo[3.1.0] product structure.

Evidence for · 2
cited by 0
# Photochemical rearrangement of 4,4‐diphenylcyclohexa‐2,5‐dien‐1‐one Tags: organic-chemistry, carbonyl-compounds, rearrangements - Score: 9 - Views: 1224 - Answers: 2 - Answered: yes - Asked by: booma vijay (877 rep) - Asked: 2020-05-10 - Edited: 2020-05-10 - Site: chemistry ## Question I can see how the option A and B are correct as it is just a standard dienone–phenol type reaction which involves a phenyl shift. However, the given answer is A, B, C and D. I do not see how C and D are formed. Does the presence of light affect the reaction? If so, how? ## Answers ### Answer by user55119 (score: 8 [ACCEPTED]) The formation of structure 6 (your D) occurs as follows. Photolysis of dienone 1 affords excited state 2 that forms cyclopropane 3. In turn, 3 is capable of breaking a different cyclopropane bond to form 5-membered ring 4. Structure 5 is a resonance structure of 4. Structure 5 closes to the [3.1.0] product 6 (your D). I don't know how you formed A (12 here) but further photolysis of 6 can form 12 via a bridged phenyl migration as shown in structure 9. A similar migration in structure 2 leads to your B. Of course, structure C has only five carbons and was added to th
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+1p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

More for · 1
cited by 0
The rearrangement of 4,4-diphenylcyclohexa-2,5-dienylidene - ScienceDirect [Skip to main content](#screen-reader-main-content)[Skip to article](#screen-reader-main-title) [![Elsevier logo](https://sdfestaticassets-us-east-1.sciencedirectassets.com/shared-assets/24/images/elsevier-non-solus-new-grey.svg)ScienceDirect](https://www.sciencedirect.com/) [My account](https://www.sciencedirect.com/user/login?targetURL=/science/article/pii/0040402082800859&from=globalheader) [Sign in](https://www.sciencedirect.com/user/institution/login?targetURL=/science/article/pii/0040402082800859) * [Access through**your institution**](https://www.sciencedirect.com/user/institution/login?targetUrl=/science/article/pii/0040402082800859) * [Purchase PDF](https://www.sciencedirect.com/getaccess/pii/0040402082800859/purchase) * * [Patient Access](https://www.elsevier.com/open-science/science-and-society/access-for-healthcare-and-patients) * Other access options Search ScienceDirect ## Article preview * [Abstract](#preview-section-abstract) * [References (12)](#preview-section-references) * [Cited by (3)](#preview-section-cited-by) [![Elsevier](https://sdfestaticassets-us-east-1.sciencedirectassets.com/prod
Everything we examined (2)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Photochemical rearrangement of 4,4‐diphenylcyclohexa‐2,5‐dien‐1‐onereferenceno side taken
  2. The rearrangement of 4,4-diphenylcyclohexa-2,5-dienylidenereferenceno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE · 004 Aug 2026
held for human review08 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt