trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Phonological theory distinguishes between cyclic and non-cyclic rule applications.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
3 sources for · 0 against

Authoritative reference literature in phonological theory documents the distinction between cyclic and non-cyclic rule applications, specifically noting that lexical rules may be cyclic.

Evidence for · 3
Transderivational Relationships in Chamorro Phonology
1983 · cited by 77
The Saipan dialect of Chamorro displays certain transderivational relationships that hold optionally between complex words and the non-complex forms from which they are derived. These relationships are examined, and it is argued that phonological theory must either allow optionally-cyclic rule application, or else recognize a class of transderivational phenomena for which the cycle cannot account.*
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+1p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

More for · 2
The handbook of phonological theory
1995 · cited by 0
of Phonological Theory Edited by John A. Goldsmith The Handbook of Phonological Theory brings together … lexical rule applications may refer to word-internal structure. ) Only post-lexical rule applications may … words. Only lexical rule applications may be cyclic. ) Lexical rule applications are structure preserving
Handbook of Phonological Theory
1996 · cited by 0
post-lexical rule applications may apply across words. (c) Only lexical rule applications may be cyclic … (d) Lexical rule applications are structure preserving. (e) Only lexical rule applications may have lexical … exceptions. (f) Lexical rule applications must precede post-lexical rule applications. Claims (54a) and (54b)
Everything we examined (3) — 2 independent sources
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. The handbook of phonological theoryreferencesame source L1no side taken
  2. Handbook of Phonological Theoryreferencesame source L1no side taken
  3. Transderivational Relationships in Chamorro Phonologypeer-reviewedno side taken
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt