Phonemic distinctions can be induced by morphology
the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says
Available linguistic sources touch upon morphological and phonetic interactions, but do not directly establish that morphology can induce phonemic distinctions.
... phoneme is in fact the analytic product of a matching of phonetic distinctions with morphological and lexical distinctions . The phoneme cannot and does not exist in isolation from words : the very minimal pairs used to discover phonemic ...
First published in 1991. The existence of morphonology had been the subject of intense debate in twentieth-century linguistic theory. Attempts to identify putatively morphonological phenomena had often foundered on the widespread assumption of a rigid dichotomy between synchronic morphological structures and the phonetic processes which historically shared them. With the difficulties of establishing any role for morphonology clearly identified, the author introduces a comparative and historical survey of the morphologization of metaphony in Italian dialects. On the basis of this the existence is argued of authentic synchronic ‘morphonological’ interaction between morphological structures and phonetic processes, such that inflectional paradigms serve to specify phonetic details of implement
This book is an important contribution to our understanding of both morphology and phonology, taking seriously the implications of abandoning a rigid distinction between synchronic morphology and diachronic phonology. It successfully integrates linguistic theory with the analysis of philological data, and indicates the direction for future research on morphonology. This detailed study of Italian dialects also constitutes a valuable addition to the study of Romance dialectology. First published in 1991. The existence of morphonology had been the subject of intense debate in twentieth-century linguistic theory.
flag Flag as inappropriate The Romance Verb: Morphomic Structure and Diachrony Martin Maiden Rp 1.980.024 Rp 1.386.017 A Linguistic History of Italian Martin Maiden Rp 1.372.744 Rp 1.098.192 A Linguistic History of Italian Martin Maiden Rp 1.693.592 Rp 1.354.870 A Reference Grammar of Modern Italian: Edition 2 Martin Maiden 5.0 star Rp 1.295.057 Rp 1.036.042 Formal Problems in Semitic Phonology and Morphology John J.
development of phonemic tone distinctions. In contrast to the limited effects of lexical borrowing, phonetic, syntactic, or morphological convergence can have greater
Language convergence is a type of linguistic change in which languages come to resemble one another structurally as a result of prolonged language contact and mutual interference, regardless of whether those languages belong to the same language family, i.e. stem from a common genealogical proto-language. In contrast to other contact-induced language changes like creolization or the formation of m
Language convergence is a type of linguistic change in which languages come to resemble one another structurally as a result of prolonged language contact and mutual interference, regardless of whether those languages belong to the same language family, i.e. stem from a common genealogical proto-language. In contrast to other contact-induced language changes like…
Language convergence is a type of linguistic change in which languages come to resemble one another structurally as a result of prolonged language contact and mutual interference, regardless of whether those languages belong to the same language family, i.e. stem from a common genealogical proto-language. In contrast to other contact-induced language changes like creolization or the formation of mixed languages, convergence refers to a mutual process that results in changes in all the languages involved. The term refers to changes in systematic linguistic patterns of the languages in contact (phonology, prosody, syntax, morphology) rather than alterations of individual lexical items.
Everything we examined (2)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.