trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Philosophical frameworks exist that posit entities beyond mind and matter
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
6 sources for · 0 against

Philosophical frameworks such as dualism, idealism, neutral monism, and dual-aspect theories explicitly posit entities or foundational domains beyond simple mind and matter.

Evidence for · 6
2020 · cited by 18
Proposes a complementarist dual-aspect model where consciousness is coprimary with matter.
See more details
The analysis

The retrieved literature extensively discusses philosophical traditions, historical frameworks, and contemporary theories (such as dualism, idealist frameworks, dual-aspect monism, and psychophysically neutral domains) that explicitly go beyond traditional materialist or strictly physicalist ontologies. Multiple papers validate or explore these non-reductionist and expanded metaphysical positions.

More for · 5
2024 · cited by 3
Discusses historical and contemporary accounts of psychophysically neutral domains beyond simple mind-matter dichotomies.
2018 · cited by 2
Advances an extended dual-aspect monism framework incorporating primary irreducible subjective experiences alongside physical aspects.
2025 · cited by 0
Validates a scale assessing diverse philosophical positions on mind and matter, including substance dualism, panpsychism, idealism, and neutral monism.
2024 · cited by 0
Examines Sāṅkhya philosophy as a distinct dualistic paradigm separating pure awareness from material nature.
2026 · cited by 0
Analyzes frameworks such as ether-mind dualistic ontology that posit entities beyond standard materialist models.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked31 Jul 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8331 Jul 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt