trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Philosophers generally agree that beliefs are the primary bearers of truth-value.
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 1 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Philosophical literature shows no uniform consensus that beliefs are the primary truth-bearers; instead, various sources debate alternative candidates like statements, propositions, and beliefs without settling on a single primary bearer.

Evidence for · 1
cited by 0
er readers to the entry on the deflationary theory of truth and the overview in Azzouni 2018. A seminal contribution is Gupta 1993. Other noteworthy contributions among many include Halbach 1999, Heck 2004, Ketland 1999, and Shapiro 1998. 6. Truth and language One of the important themes in the literature on truth is its connection to meaning, or more generally, to language. This has proved an important application of ideas about truth, and an important issue in the study of truth itself. This section will consider a number of issues relating truth and language. 6.1 Truth-bearers There have been many debates in the literature over what the primary bearers of truth are. Candidates typically include beliefs, propositions, sentences, and utterances. We have already seen in section 1 that the classical debates on truth took this issue very seriously, and what sort of theory of truth was viable was often seen to depend on what the bearers of truth are. In spite of the number of options under discussion, and the significance that has sometimes been placed on the choice, there is an important similarity between candidate truth-bearers. Consider the role of truth-bearers in the correspondence theory, for instance. We have seen versions of it which take beliefs, propositions, or interpreted sentences to be the primary bearers of truth. But all of them rely upon the idea that their truth-bearers are meaningful , and are thereby able to say something about what the world is like. (We might say that they are able to represent the world, but that is to use ‘represent’ in a wider sense than we saw in section 3.2. No assumptions about just what stands in relations to what objects are required to see truth-bearers as meaningful.) It is in virtue of being meaningful that truth-bearers are able to enter into correspondence relations. Truth-bearers are things which meaningfully make claims about what the world is like, and are true or false depending on whether the facts i
Evidence against · 1
2011 · cited by 0
complete declarative sentence. Statements are the primary bearers of truth values. Strong argument An argument … universe,’ “Forms are the ultimate entities of the universe,’ or “Individual substances are the concrete particulars … held true beliefs are knowledge. In defense of the view, keep in mind that Ken's beliefs are nonaccidentally
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:refuted:single_source:for=0+1p:against=1+0p:partial_opposition=1 | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (2)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Truth (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)referenceno side taken
  2. Reflections on philosophy : introductory essaysreferenceno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
held for human review07 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt