Trust Me Bro: the receipt

trustme.bro/r/…

✓ checked

trust me, bro:

here is the receipt.

the claim

Philosophers clearly define the word consciousness in their arguments

the verdict

REFUTED

the evidence says no

confidence 0/100

Philosophical sources directly refute the claim that consciousness is clearly defined, noting instead that the concept is notoriously ambiguous and lacks consensus.

Evidence against · 3

Wikipedia: Consciousness

cited by 0

Reference article covering this claim directly

citation format

See more details

More against · 2

iep.utm.edu: Consciousness

cited by 0

States explicitly that the concept of consciousness is notoriously ambiguous in philosophy.

plato.stanford.edu: Consciousness - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

cited by 0

Notes there is a lack of any agreed upon theory of consciousness within philosophy.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography

first checked31 Jul 2026

judged → REFUTED · 031 Jul 2026

More receipts

Is it true that Theodore Roosevelt said the quote about things that will destroy America?Is it true that John F. Kennedy wrote in his diaries that Hitler was one of the most significant figures of the century?Is it true that A historically known figure stated that a state unable to feed itself is not a formidable foe.?

Random receipt →The Trust Wiki →

This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: the research is thin, dig deeper

trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt