trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Patients with ventilator-associated events stay in the ICU for a longer duration
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
6 sources for · 0 against

Multiple clinical studies and large registry data consistently demonstrate that patients who experience ventilator-associated events or complications stay in the intensive care unit for a significantly longer duration.

Evidence for · 6
2013 · cited by 172
Paper 0 found that ventilator-associated complications were associated with significantly increased ICU length of stay.
See more details
The analysis

The claim is specific, empirical, and testable. Numerous provided studies (e.g., [0], [2], [3], [4], [7]) directly evaluate and confirm that ventilator-associated events, complications, or tracheobronchitis lead to prolonged ICU lengths of stay. There are no refuting papers among the retrieved sources.

More for · 5
2022 · cited by 72
Paper 1 notes that increases in ventilator-associated events align with longer mean ICU lengths of stay.
2013 · cited by 33
Paper 2 demonstrates that ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis is a significant risk factor for increased duration of ICU stay.
2021 · cited by 24
Paper 3 shows that patients developing ventilator-associated events had a prolonged length of stay in the ICU.
2017 · cited by 23
Paper 4 reports that ventilator-associated events were associated with significantly more ventilation and pediatric ICU length of stay.
2024 · cited by 4
Paper 7 establishes that a ventilator-associated event tier was associated with extra days of ventilation and ICU stay.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8904 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt