Trust Me Bro: the receipt

trustme.bro/r/…

✓ checked

trust me, bro:

here is the receipt.

the claim

Paraphrenia remains a recognized clinical diagnostic category in psychiatry

the verdict

REFUTED

the evidence says no

confidence 0/100

Paraphrenia is no longer recognized as an independent diagnostic category in major modern psychiatric manuals like the DSM-5, having lost its status as a distinct nosological entity.

Evidence against · 5

Wikipedia: Paraphrenia

cited by 0

Reference article covering this claim directly

citation format

See more details

More against · 4

cambridge.org: Paraphrenia - forgotten or undiagnosable psychosis? | European Psychiatry | Cambridge Core

cited by 0

Notes that paraphrenia has generally lost its status as an independent nosological entity and is excluded from DSM-5.

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov: Paraphrenia – current psychopathological and diagnoses landmarks - PMC

cited by 0

Indicates paraphrenia has an uncertain nosological status and is not in the DSM-5.

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov: Paraphrenia: a lost concept

cited by 0

Entitled 'Paraphrenia: a lost concept', showing it is not a current standard diagnostic category.

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov: Beyond Classification: A Case Report Exploring Paraphrenia in Late-Onset Psychosis - PMC

cited by 0

States that paraphrenia has been excluded from current diagnostic systems.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography

first checked01 Aug 2026

judged → REFUTED · 001 Aug 2026

More receipts

Is it true that Firms facing negative shocks reduce labor costs through layoffs rather than nominal wage cuts?Is it true that Empirical evidence shows a positive relationship between market competition and overall economic welfare?Is it true that William Nordhaus contributed foundational models to the economics of climate change?

Random receipt →The Trust Wiki →

This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: the research is thin, dig deeper

trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt