trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Opportunity cost represents the loss of potential gain from other alternatives when one alternative is chosen.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
9 sources for · 0 against

Reference works and economic literature explicitly define opportunity cost as the loss of potential gain from other alternatives when one alternative is chosen.

Evidence for · 9
2013 · cited by 15
Economic impact studies are frequently commissioned to justify investments in sport projects. However, decisions also should include a consideration of a project’s costs since it is the net return on investment that should drive decisions. Whenever taxpayer funds are expended on a sports project there is an opportunity cost. Three types of opportunity cost are discussed. Explicit costs are those for which a government entity “writes a check.” They are comprised of event costs, land and infrastructure costs, and operations and maintenance costs. Implicit costs are those which remain “hidden” from most taxpayers: foregone property taxes, strategic underestimation of capital costs, displacement costs, and an inequitable nexus between payers and beneficiaries. External costs are those incurred by taxpayers beyond the boundaries of a local jurisdiction.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:for=3+5p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

More for · 8
2023 · cited by 3
The loss of potential gain from other alternatives when one alternative is chosen.
1995 · cited by 0
of one alternative requires us to give up something of the other. OPPORTUNITY COST An unpleasant … could not gain from specialization and trade of products with Mason. Potential gain, though … produce only at a high opportunity cost, pursuit of the potential gain will motivate the individual
cited by 0
instead. The New Oxford American Dictionary defines it as "the loss of potential gain from other alternatives when one alternative is chosen". As a representation In microeconomic theory, the opportunity cost of a choice is the value of the best alternative forgone where, given limited resources, a choice needs to be made between several mutually exclusive alternatives. Assuming the best choice is made, it is the "cost" incurred by not enjoying the benefit that would have been had if the second best available choice had been taken instead. The New Oxford Am In microeconomic theory, the opportunity cost of a choice is the value of the best alternative forgone where, given limited resources, a choice needs to be made between several mutually exclusive alternatives. Assuming the best choice is made, it is the "cost" incurred by not enjoying the benefit that would have been had if the second best available choice had been taken instead. The New Oxford American Dictionary defines it as "the loss of potential gain from other alternatives when one alternative is chosen". As a representation of the relationship between scarcity and choice, the objective of opportunity cost is to ensure efficient use of scarce resources. It incorporates all associated costs of a decision, both explicit and implicit. Thus, opportunity costs are not restricted to monetary or financial costs: the real cost of output forgone, lost time, pleasure, or any other benefit that provides utility should also be considered an opportunity cost.
1995 · cited by 0
of one alternative requires us to give up something of the other. OPPORTUNITY COST An unpleasant … could not gain from specialization and trade of products with Mason. Potential gain, though … produce only at a high opportunity cost, pursuit of the potential gain will motivate the individual
cited by 0
The cost of an opportunity forgone (and the loss of the benefits that could be received from that opportunity); the most valuable forgone alternative.: #: #: #* #* {{quote-journal|en |title=How our home delivery habit reshaped the world|author=Samanth Subramanian|date=November 21 2019|journal=w:The Guardian|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/nov/21/how-our-home-delivery-habit-reshaped-the-world |passage=Implicit in this fixation with time is the thesis that the opportunity cost of regular shopping is too high – that the hours spent driving to the better bookstore in the next town can be spent doing something more valuable. But as our urban lives have grown more pressed for time, we have diced our opportunity costs finer and finer; from budgeting days or slabs of hours, we have come to rationing minutes.|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20200406235857/https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/nov/21/how-our-home-delivery-habit-reshaped-the-world}}
2021 · cited by 0
Nowadays, education is considered an important part of individual personal development with high potential for society as well. Many people are encouraged to study and improve their skills and abilities. For a lot of them the tertiary education is an imaginary goal to be attained. It represents an opportunity to become one of the elite of the nation, to achieve a higher social status, self-satisfaction or to fulfil oneself. The aim of the article, however, is to find out whether tertiary education will also pay off from an economic point of view. Attained tertiary education (ISCED 5-8), especially in its full-time form, could generally be associated with limited employment possibilities on labour market, and thus with the loss of potential income of an employee with secondary education (ISCED 3-4) during the period of studies. This loss of potential income represents opportunity cost from economic point of view. On the other hand, with an increased qualification higher income is associated. In connection with the abovementioned approach and according to Eurostat data about mean and median income by educational attainment level (EU-SILC survey), the return on tertiary education for Member States of the European Union are assessed through payback period and rate of return. The results suggest that for many Member States tertiary education pays off, but there are also Member States where the economic benefits of the tertiary education, assessed according to this approach, is dou
cited by 0
The cost-effectiveness approach is limited because it foregoes the opportunity provided by cost-benefit analysis to compare the relative desirability of investing in onchocerciasis control with alternative investments in other sectors. However, it does permit useful judgments to be made about the relative efficiency of allocating scarce resources to onchocerciasis control compared to other possible investments within the health sector. For this purpose, an illustrative comparison is made with estimates of the cost-effectiveness of measles immunization. Published in Social science & medicine (1982) (1984)
cited by 0
the opportunity cost of different alternatives. See also Decision analysis and Decision theory. Satisficing: examining alternatives only until the first In psychology, decision-making (also spelled decision making and decisionmaking) is regarded as the cognitive process resulting in the selection of a belief or a course of action among several possible alternative options. It could be either rational or irrational. The decision-making process is a reasoning process based on assumptions of values, preferences and beliefs of the decision-maker. Ever Selective search for evidence (also known as confirmation bias): People tend to be willing to gather facts that support certain conclusions but disregard other facts that support different conclusions. Individuals who are highly defensive in this manner show significantly greater left prefrontal cortex activity as measured by EEG than do less defensive individuals. Premature termination of search for evidence: People tend to accept the first alternative that looks like it might work. Cognitive inertia is the unwillingness to change existing thought patterns in the face of new circumstances. Selective perception: People actively screen out information that they do not think is important (see also Prejudice). In one demonstration of this effect, the discounting of arguments with which one disagrees (by judging them as untrue or irrelevant) was decreased by selective activation of the right prefrontal cortex. Wishful thinking is a tendency to want to see things in a certain – usually positive – light, which can distort perception and thinking. Choice-supportive bias occurs when people distort their memories of chosen and rejected options to make the chosen options seem more attractive. Recency: People tend to place…
Everything we examined (9) — 7 independent sources
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Opportunity Cost and Missed Chances in Optimizing Cybersecuritypeer-reviewedno side taken
  2. Economics : private and public choicereferencesame source L2no side taken
  3. Opportunity costreferencesame source L3no side taken
  4. Microeconomics : private and public choicereferencesame source L2no side taken
  5. Wiktionary: opportunity costreferenceno side taken
  6. IS TERTIARY EDUCATION WORTH IT?peer-reviewedno side taken
  7. PubMed: The economics of blindness prevention in Upper Volta under the Onchocerciasis Control Program.peer-reviewedno side taken
  8. Decision-makingreferencesame source L3no side taken
  9. Costs: The Rest of the Economic Impact Storyreferenceno side taken
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt