trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Normal paper currency contains enough narcotics residue to attract drug-sniffing dogs
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 0 against

Peer-reviewed literature establishes that a large majority of circulated paper currency is contaminated with cocaine residues in quantities sufficient to cause alerts by drug-sniffing dogs.

Evidence for · 2
2018 · cited by 11
Several studies have reported on wide‐spread contamination of U.S. paper currency with cocaine and to a lesser extent other illicit drugs. Canines are trained and employed to search for and alert to drugs. Canine alert to currency has been used as evidence that currency has been directly involved in illicit drug trafficking to justify currency seizure and forfeiture. This assertion, particularly when the only evidence is based upon canine alert, has been challenged in the courts considering that most currency in circulation is contaminated with cocaine. Comprehensive review of the scientific literature establishes that (i) 67–100% of circulated U.S. currency is contaminated with cocaine ranging from a few nanograms to over one milligram/bill (ii) various biological and environmental parameters impact canine alert to drugs. It is concluded that canine alert to U.S. currency is not sufficiently reliable to determine that currency was directly used in an illicit drug transaction.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+1p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

More for · 1
2013 · cited by 4
Cocaine is one of the most problematic illicit drugs in Brazil, because of its social impact and toxicological data for users and society in general. One form of this drug is used intranasal, when it is in the form of cocaine hydrochloride and can be sniffed using paper money as an artifact. Thus, our study aimed to examine banknotes of R$ 2.00 (two reais) from Belo Horizonte-MG, in order to determine the percentage of notes with cocaine residues and for knowing the quantitative profile of them. The notes (n = 50) were collected from outlets in downtown of Belo Horizonte and stored in envelopes for the analysis. New notes obtained from the Central Bank were used as blank sample. The notes was extracted with solvents in ultrasound bath. The two extracts were mixed, centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 3 minutes and analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detector (235 nm). The method was validated, and revealed a linearity between 0.5 and 10 g/mL (10 to 200 g/bill), mean intra and inter precision test of 5.3 % and 7.6 % respectively and average recovery of 98 %. Contaminants commonly present in cocaine street drug like lidocaine, benzocaine, caffeine, acetaminophen and propranolol do not show any peaks at the same retention time of cocaine. After analysis, the banknotes were dried and returned to service without any damage and loss of security features. Of 50 notes analyzed, 43 had cocaine residues. The average concentration of cocaine found in the notes was (148.56 + 230.06) g /bill (RSD = 155 %), and 36 % had levels between 10 and 50 g/bill. Thus, we conclude that the banknotes of R$ 2 reais in the central region of Belo Horizonte, have a high percentage of contamination by cocaine, which may come from direct contamination of the drug in notes or indirectly between notes contaminated and contaminated surfaces.
Everything we examined (2)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Drug Contamination of U.S. Paper Currency and Forensic Relevance of Canine Alert to Paper Currency: A Critical Review of the Scientific Literaturepeer-reviewedno side taken
  2. Cocaine Contamination in Belo Horizonte-MG Paper Currencypeer-reviewedno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked31 Jul 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8231 Jul 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt