Non-reductive physicalism explains mental phenomena through supervenience on physical states
the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against
The retrieved literature touches on non-reductive physicalist approaches and mental properties, but does not provide specific evidence detailing how supervenience explains mental phenomena.
In this paper, we shall cover the theoretical and methodological fundamentals of emergentism in contemporary philosophy of mind and linguistics. The main purpose is to pinpoint the benefits of emergent models in the context of non-reductive functionalism, the theory of syntactic complexity and conceptual semantics. In our view, the dynamic model of the structuring process of elementary components allows associate the mind-body problem of consciousness with the problem of syntactic complexity and properties of non-strict semantics. The emergent structuring is dynamic, flexible, variable, and prone to compromise on the rules that have shaped the structural elements. In our view, this key feature of consciousness (multiple vague interpretation) is reflected in the semantics and pragmatics of the language sign. We proceed from the statement that the "challenging problem" of consciousness, the result of a specific ontology of the language sign. The semantic and pragmatic nature of a linguistic sign may be considered a link between mental states, phenomenal judgments (self-assessment), and mental causation. The article substantiates the idea that the emergent approach may help avoiding the linear downward causation and reductive physicalism, while the qualitative emergentism may be represented in terms of conceptual semantic processes. The emergent properties of language and consciousness result from the constraints imposed by different ontological areas: brain structure, principle