trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Non-academic extracurricular activities influence graduate school admissions
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 0 against

Evidence from admissions surveys and large-scale application analyses indicates that non-academic extracurricular activities play a notable role in graduate school admissions processes.

Evidence for · 2
2020 · cited by 23
Survey data from admissions coordinators explicitly shows that extracurricular activities are explored as part of the difficult-to-quantify aspects influencing admissions decisions for economics PhD programs.
See more details
The analysis

The retrieved papers include studies and surveys of admissions coordinators demonstrating that non-academic components like extracurricular activities are formally evaluated or surveyed in graduate and professional admissions processes, supporting the claim without any contradictory evidence regarding this specific point.

More for · 1
2023 · cited by 7
Analysis of millions of applications from the Common Application dataset demonstrates that reporting extracurricular activities, leadership positions, and awards plays an influential and scrutinized role in admissions at selective institutions.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8404 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt