Noether's theorem links gauge symmetries to local conservation laws like charge.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
5 sources for · 0 against
Peer-reviewed literature and reference materials confirm that Noether's theorem connects gauge symmetries, such as local gauge invariance, to local conservation laws like the conservation of charge.
Noether's general analysis of conservation laws has to be completed in a Lagrangian theory with local gauge invariance. Bulk charges are replaced by fluxes at a suitable singularity (in general, at infinity) of so-called superpotentials, namely local functions of the gauge fields (or more generally of the gauge forms). Some gauge-invariant bulk charges and current densities may subsist when distinguished one-dimensional subgroups are present. We shall study mostly local consequences of gauge invariance. Quite generally there exist local superpotentials analogous to those of Freud or Bergmann for general relativity. They are parametrized by infinitesimal gauge transformations, but are afflicted by topological ambiguities which one must handle on a case-by-case basis. The choice of variational principle: variables, surface terms and boundary conditions is crucial. As a first illustration we propose a new affine action that reduces to general relativity upon gauge fixing the dilatation (Weyl-1918-like) part of the connection and elimination of auxiliary fields. We can also reduce it by similar considerations either to the Palatini action or to the Cartan-Weyl moving frame action and compare the associated superpotentials. This illustrates the concept of Noether identities. We formulate a vanishing theorem for the superpotential and the current when there is a (Killing) global isometry or its generalization. We distinguish between asymptotic symmetries and symmetries defined in the bulk. A second and independent application is a geometrical reinterpretation of the convection of vorticity in barotropic non-viscous fluids first established by Helmholtz-Kelvin, Eckart and Ertel. In the homentropic case it can be seen to follow by a general theorem from the vanishing of the superpotential corresponding to the time-independent relabelling symmetry. The special diffeomorphism symmetry is, in the absence of dynamical gauge field and spin, associated with a vanishing internal transverse momentum flux density. We also consider the non-homentropic case. We identify the one-dimensional subgroups responsible for the bulk charges and thus propose an impulsive forcing for creating or destroying selectively helicity (respectively enstrophies) in odd (respectively even) dimensions. This is an example of a new and general forcing rule.
In recent years, several gauge-symmetric particle-in-cell (PIC) methods have been developed whose simulations of particles and electromagnetic fields exactly conserve charge. While it is rightly observed that these methods’ gauge symmetry gives rise to their charge conservation, this causal relationship has generally been asserted via ad hoc derivations of the associated conservation laws. In this work, we develop a comprehensive theoretical grounding for charge conservation in gauge-symmetric Lagrangian and Hamiltonian PIC algorithms. For Lagrangian variational PIC methods, we apply Noether’s second theorem to demonstrate that gauge symmetry gives rise to a local charge conservation law as an off-shell identity. For Hamiltonian splitting methods, we show that the momentum map establishes their charge conservation laws. We define a new class of algorithms – gauge-compatible splitting methods – that exactly preserve the momentum map associated with a Hamiltonian system’s gauge symmetry – even after time discretization. This class of algorithms affords splitting schemes a decided advantage over alternative Hamiltonian integrators. We apply this general technique to design a novel, explicit, symplectic, gauge-compatible splitting PIC method, whose momentum map yields an exact local charge conservation law. Our study clarifies the appropriate initial conditions for such schemes and examines their symplectic reduction.
We review the Lagrangian formulation of (generalised) Noether symmetries in the framework of Calculus of Variations in Jet Bundles, with a special attention to so-called “Natural Theories” and “Gauge-Natural Theories” that include all relevant Field Theories and physical applications (from Mechanics to General Relativity, to Gauge Theories, Supersymmetric Theories, Spinors, etc.). It is discussed how the use of Poincar´e–Cartan forms and decompositions of natural (or gauge-natural) variational operators give rise to notions such as “generators of Noether symmetries”, energy and reduced energy flow, Bianchi identities, weak and strong conservation laws, covariant conservation laws, Hamiltonian-like conservation laws (such as, e.g., so-calledADMlaws in General Relativity) with emphasis on the physical interpretation of the quantities calculated in specific cases (energy, angular momentum, entropy, etc.). A few substantially new and very recent applications/examples are presented to better show the power of the methods introduced: one in Classical Mechanics (definition of strong conservation laws in a frame-independent setting and a discussion on the way in which conserved quantities depend on the choice of an observer); one in Classical Field Theories (energy and entropy in General Relativity, in its standard formulation, in its spin-frame formulation, in its first order formulation “à la Palatini” and in its extensions to Non-Linear Gravity Theories); one in Quantum Field Theories (applications to conservation laws in Loop Quantum Gravity via spin connections and Barbero–Immirzi connections).
Emmy Noether showed that conservation laws can be said to arise from symmetries in the laws of physics. This theorem, called Noether's theorem gives physicists an extremely powerful tool to try and solve complicated problems. For example:
- Since there is no absolute position, only relative position, we can get that the total momentum of a closed system is conserved. - Since there is no absolute time, only relative time, we can get that the total energy of a closed system is conserved. - Since there is no absolute orientation or preferred direction in space, only relative orientation, we can get that the total angular momentum of a closed system is conserved. - There are more complicated symmetries, like local gauge invariance which lead to the conservation of charge. Types of Conservation laws
Conservation laws can come in two types, global, or local. Global conservation
A global conservation law just says that the total amount of something in the universe does not change in time. Local conservation
A local conservation law says a little bit more than that.
Amalie Emmy Noether (23 March 1882 – 14 April 1935) was a German mathematician who made many important contributions to abstract algebra. She also proved Noether's first and second theorems, which are fundamental in mathematical physics. Noether was described by Pavel Alexandrov, Albert Einstein, Jean Dieudonné, Hermann Weyl, and Norbert Wiener as the most important woman in the history of mathema
Noether was brought to Göttingen in 1915 by Hilbert and Klein, who wanted her expertise in invariant theory to help them understand general relativity, a geometrical theory of gravitation developed mainly by Einstein. Hilbert had observed that the conservation of energy seemed to be violated in general relativity, because gravitational energy could itself gravitate. Noether provided the resolution of this paradox, and a fundamental tool of modern theoretical physics, in a 1918 paper. This paper presented two theorems, of which the first is known as Noether's theorem. Together, these theorems not only solve the problem for general relativity, but also determine the conserved quantities for every system of physical laws that possesses some continuous symmetry. Upon receiving her work, Einstein wrote to Hilbert:Yesterday I received from Miss Noether a very interesting paper on invariants. I'm impressed that such things can be understood in such a general way. The old guard at Göttingen should take some lessons from Miss Noether! She seems to know her stuff.
For illustration, if a physical system behaves the same, regardless of how it is oriented in space, the physical laws that govern it are rotationally symmetric; from this symmetry, Noether's theorem shows the angular momentum of the system must be conserved. The physical system itself need not be symmetric; a jagged asteroid tumbling in space conserves angular momentum despite its asymmetry. Rather, the symmetry of the physical laws governing the system is responsible for the conservation law. As another example, if a physical experiment works the same way at any place and at any time, then its laws are symmetric under continuous translations in space and time; by Noether's theorem, these symmetries account for the conservation laws of linear momentum and energy within this system, respectively.
At the time, physicists were not familiar with Sophus Lie's theory of continuous groups, on which Noether had built. Many physicists first learned of Noether's theorem from an article by Edward Lee Hill that presented only a special case of it. Consequently, the full scope of her result was not immediately appreciated.…
A…
Everything we examined (5) — 4 independent sources
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.