trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Negative interest rates affect cash holding behavior

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Economic literature and empirical evidence consistently indicate that negative interest rates influence cash holding behavior, often driving an increased demand for cash as a medium of wealth storage.

The analysis

The retrieved literature contains direct empirical evidence (e.g., EU country data) and theoretical economic analyses establishing that negative interest rates alter cash usage and holding behavior. Papers [2], [4], and [5] specifically support the claim, while the remaining papers are either tangential or examine unrelated topics.

Evidence for · 3
Recorded source metadata

José M. Liñares‐Zegarra, Magnus Willesson. The effects of negative interest rates on cash usage: Evidence for EU countries. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109674

Using empirical difference-in-differences analysis across EU countries, this study demonstrates that negative interest rates lead to an observable increase in cash usage.

See more details
More for · 2
Recorded source metadata

David Humphrey. Negative interest rates and the demand for cash. 2016. https://doi.org/10.69554/ekuq3510

This study discusses how negative interest rates imposed by central banks create incentives for depositors and banks to increase their demand for and holding of physical cash.

Recorded source metadata

Aleksander Berentsen, Hugo van Buggenum, Romina Ruprecht. On the Negatives of Negative Interest Rates. 2023. https://doi.org/10.17016/feds.2023.064

The research models long-run macroeconomic effects of negative interest rates and notes that the availability of cash plays a key role in driving asymmetric behavioral and policy responses.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8301 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt