Nazi concentration camps were originally intended as death camps from their inception
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
0 sources for · 3 against
Historical scholarship indicates that early Nazi concentration camps were originally designed for political repression, forced labor, and detention rather than as mass extermination or death camps from their inception.
Abstract
From 1933 to 1939, the Nazi concentration camps were sites of terror, torture, and deliberate killing. But they were not sites of mass murder. The early camps were designed for political repression. Within the first year of Nazi rule, about seventy concentration camps were set up, plus thirty ‘protective custody sections’ in prisons. But by mid-1934, most prisoners had been released, and the existence of the camps was in jeopardy. Why the camps survived is explained by the institutional infighting within the regime, from which the SS under Himmler emerged as victor, gaining control over the police and the camps. Soon, the camps expanded, gaining new functions: the prevention of potential resistance, the campaign against the ‘asocials’, and ‘racial general prevention’. New camps were built, and prisoner numbers rose rapidly, especially with the mass arrest of Jewish men during the November 1938 pogrom. The chapter discusses the vicious social/racial hierarchy of inmates, the role of Kapos, and the nature of performative violence. In preparation for war, from 1937 plans were made for the mass arrest of ‘unreliable types’; by now, the major purpose was to prevent another ‘November 1918’. The fate of several victims and several perpetrator biographies are outlined as exemplars. Nazi concentration camps differed radically from the colonial camps and the First World War camps: less lethal by far, so far, but nevertheless an instrument of unlimited terror to crush democracy, for social/racial engineering, and regime stabilization for imperial war.
... original Polish name , Oswiecim , had become familiar.24 ... concentration camps such as Buchenwald , Dachau and Belsen were not the major sites of Nazi ... death camp ' . Rees traces the ' inception ' of Belsen to 1943 when it was intended ...
The Second World War brought suffering and trauma to the people of Europe on an unprecedented scale. While Europeans were not strangers to the harsh realities of international conflict, World War II galvanized a new range of destructive forces that shook the continent to its intellectual, psychological and material foundations. This volume addresses World War II as a common European trauma by focusing on key trans-national developments and comparing the different wars as experienced by three similar civilian populations.
On October 2, 1933, Neusustrum became the fourth and final subcamp of the State Concentration Camp Papenburg (Staatliches Konzentrationslager Papenburg). Commanded by SS-Sturmführer Emil Faust (Nazi Party [NSDAP] No. 151165), this 1,000-man “barracks camp” furnished labor for Emsland cultivation.1 Unlike Börgermoor and the two Esterwegen subcamps, Neusustrum was situated near the Dutch border, within the Sustrum and west of the Bourtanger Moors. As its numerical designation suggested, the Prusiian Ministry of Interior once intended it to be the fifth subcamp. Hermann Göring’s state secretary Ludwig Grauert allocated the same financial resources for Neusustrum as for the two Esterwegen camps, 700,000 Reichsmark (RM), because he originally foresaw it being a 2,000-prisoner camp.2 The details of Neusustrum’s construction are not available, but the task probably belonged to the first inmates. Prisoner Gerd Nixdorf remembered the camp’s unfinished state from his arrival at the beginning ...
Everything we examined (4) — 3 independent sources
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.