trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
NASA monitored and evaluated pulmonary edema risks during the Apollo missions
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
confidence 10/100

Evidence indicates that pulmonary edema was not considered a significant risk during the Apollo missions due to adequate oxygen partial pressure maintained in the spacecraft cabin, and it was not among NASA's listed medical operational concerns.

Evidence against · 2
space.stackexchange.com: Was NASA concerned about Pulmonary Edema during ...
cited by 0
Notes that Apollo astronauts were not at risk for pulmonary edema because 100% O2 maintained adequate partial pressure.
See more details
More against · 1
ntrs.nasa.gov: 19700010467.pdf
cited by 0
Lists the actual medical concerns of the Apollo program, omitting pulmonary edema.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked31 Jul 2026
judged → REFUTED · 1031 Jul 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt