trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
N95 respirators significantly reduce ambient oxygen levels in-flight
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
0 sources for · 2 against

Peer-reviewed studies examining physiological parameters during respirator use report no significant differences in oxygen saturation or oxygen levels attributable to wearing N95 masks.

Evidence against · 2
2013 · cited by 0
Ten subjects underwent treadmill exercise at 5.6 km/h over one hour while wearing each of three identical appearing, cup-shaped, prototype filtering facepiece respirators that differed only in their filter resistances (3 mm, 6 mm, and 9 mm H2O pressure drop). There were no statistically significant differences between filtering facepiece respirators with respect to impact on physiological parameters (i.e., heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, transcutaneous carbon dioxide levels, tympanic membrane temperature), pulmonary function variables (i.e., tidal volume, respiratory rate, vol
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:refuted:for=0+0p:against=2+0p | v55:sufficiency

More against · 1
2024 · cited by 0
Wearing facepieces is discussed in the context of increasing the volume of rebreathed air. We hypothesized that rebreathed air volume increases with increasing filtering facepiece (FFP) class and that persons breathing via facepieces compensate for the additional dead-space. We have determined the effective amount of rebreathed air for a surgical masks and FFP2 and FFP3 respirators in a physical model and determined tidal volumes, breathing frequency, blood oxygen saturation, and transcutaneously measured blood carbon dioxide partial pressure (PCO2) in lung-healthy subjects breathing without a
Everything we examined (2)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Impact of Low Filter Resistances on Subjective and Physiological Responses to Filtering Facepiece Respiratorspeer-reviewedno side taken
  2. Effective volume of rebreathed air during breathing with facepieces increases with protection class and decreases with ambient airflowpeer-reviewedno side taken
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt