trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Multiple diagnostic methods are established for identifying helminth infections

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
4 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Multiple scientific studies and systematic reviews demonstrate that various established diagnostic methods, including microscopy, coproantigen ELISAs, and molecular techniques such as PCR, are used to identify helminth infections.

The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:for=4+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

The recorded search did not run a separate search for evidence against it.

Evidence for · 4
Recorded source metadata

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol: Diagnostic Accuracy Assessment for Soil-Transmitted Helminth Using Microscopy and Molecular-Based Methods. 2024. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4922081

Soil-transmitted helminth (STH) is a part of NTDs that remains to be eliminated because of its significant global impact. Diagnostics are essential in aiding the elimination of STH infection. Therefore, it is imperative to evaluate the progress of diagnostic techniques, especially molecular-based techniques. Nevertheless, there is currently no comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) evaluating the performance of molecular-based techniques for diagnosing STH. This protocol, registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024563432), intends to assess the diagnostic accuracy of molecular-based techniques compared to microscopic-based techniques for four common STH infections (A. lumbricoides, T. trichiura, hookworm, and S. stercoralis) across global studies. Two authors will independently conduct the screening, study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment of this SRMA. The obtained studies will be assessed using QUADAS-2 and will be analyzed for publication bias and diagnostic accuracy, including sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, and DOR, and SROC. This developed protocol is expected to be versatile enough to be implemented in the range of studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of the advance compared to the convention methods with adjustments. The findings of this SRMA are expected to provide a valuable contribution towards achieving the goal of eradicating STH infection by 2030.

See more details
More for · 3
Recorded source metadata

Diagnostic Techniques of Soil-Transmitted Helminths: Impact on Control Measures.. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed5020093

Soil-transmitted helminth (STH) infections are common in the tropical and subtropical countries. The burden of disease is highest in endemic areas with limited access to good quality water supply and poor sanitary conditions. Major approaches to control and reduce morbidity caused by worm infections include the periodic deworming of pre-school and school-aged children with anthelminthic drugs. Population-based studies and individual patient management including interventional studies can only be successful when accurate diagnostic techniques are used. The lack of appropriate diagnostic tools providing accurate results concerning both infectious status and intensity of infection-as these two factors vary in regions of low infection intensities-is a major challenge. Currently, available techniques show limited sensitivity and specificity and as such, a combination of several techniques is usually used to diagnose the large variety of parasite species. The objective of this review was to describe the advantages and disadvantages of the different available techniques for the diagnosis of STH infections and to highlight their use in control programs.

Recorded source metadata

A Comparative Analysis of Microscopy, Coproantigen Serology, and Nested Multiplex PCR in the Laboratory Diagnosis of Entamoeba histolytica Infection. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1732488

Abstract Objectives Amoebiasis is caused by the most common intestinal protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica. This parasite causes amoebic colitis, which is manifested by diarrhea, followed by dysentery. The laboratory diagnosis of intestinal amoebiasis in most cases is by microscopic examination of stool samples. Other nonroutine methods include coproantigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) from stool samples, serum ELISA for antibodies, stool culture, isoenzyme analysis, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The present study aimed to comparatively analyze the different diagnostic modalities used for the detection of E. histolytica from the stool sample of patients with intestinal amoebiasis. Materials and Methods This study was undertaken with 631 patients, during a period of 3 years, from January 2017 to December 2019. Stool specimen obtained from each patient was subjected to direct microscopic wet mount examination, coproantigen ELISA, and nested multiplex PCR, respectively. Results Out of all the patients tested, 5.2% were positive for E. histolytica. Among the positive cases, stool microscopy was positive in 3.17%, coproantigen ELISA was positive in 29 (4.6%) cases, and PCR was positive in 30 (4.75%) cases. Statistical Analysis The prevalence of E. histolytica infection was summarized as percentages. The three diagnostic tests done were statistically analyzed, taking microscopy as the gold standard. The agreement between techniques (microscopy, coproantigen ELISA, and PCR) was analyzed with kappa statistics. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were summarized as percentage with 95% confidence interval. Conclusion In all suspected amoebiasis cases, a combination of stool microscopy, coproantigen testing with molecular detection of the parasite offers the best approach to diagnosis of this parasitic infection.

Recorded source metadata

Molecular evidence of a high prevalence of Opisthorchis viverrini infection in an endemic community in Sakon Nakhon Province, northeastern Thailand.. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-026-00929-3

<h4>Background</h4>Opisthorchiasis caused by Opisthorchis viverrini infection is a major public health concern in Thailand. Despite decades of surveillance and control efforts, accurately estimating the true prevalence of O. viverrini remains a challenge. This study aimed to investigate the epidemiology of O. viverrini infection in an endemic community in northeastern Thailand using a combination of microscopic and molecular diagnostic methods.<h4>Methods</h4>A cross-sectional survey was conducted from May to July 2025 in Kusuman District, Sakon Nakhon Province. Demographic and behavioral data were collected using a standardized questionnaire. Stool samples were obtained from participants and examined using simple wet smear and modified Kato-Katz techniques to detect O. viverrini eggs and other intestinal parasites. In parallel, DNA was extracted from stool samples and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) gene was performed to confirm the presence of O. viverrini. Multiple logistic regression was used to investigate factors associated with infection.<h4>Results</h4>Among 246 participants, stool microscopy detected intestinal helminth infections in 10.2%, with O. viverrini being the most prevalent species (6.1%). Notably, all microscopy-positive O. viverrini cases were very light-intensity infections (< 500 eggs per gram [EPG] of stool). ITS2-specific PCR identified a higher prevalence of O. viverrini infection at 19.9%, detecting significantly more than three times as many cases as microscopy (P < 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis further showed that being male was associated with higher odds of O. viverrini infection (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 5.55; 95% CI 2.41-12.83; P < 0.001), whereas participants aged 41-60 years had significantly lower odds compared to older individuals (aOR 0.08; 95% CI 0.03-0.19; P < 0.001).<h4>Conclusions</h4>This study demonstrates that O. viverrini infection remains highly prevalent in rural communities of northeast Thailand. Molecular diagnosis was more sensitive than conventional microscopy and key demographic risk factors were identified. These findings underscore the need for active surveillance and provide valuable data to guide and strengthen future prevention and control strategies for O. viverrini and other helminth infections in the region.

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt