trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Motor imagery of exercise produces measurable muscle growth
the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
5 sources for · 0 against

The retrieved evidence indicates that motor imagery training can improve muscle strength, force, and neural activation, but it does not substantiate that motor imagery produces actual measurable physical muscle growth or hypertrophy.

Evidence for · 5
2023 · cited by 20
Objective The current review was aimed to determine the effectiveness of mental imagery training (MIT) on the enhancement of maximum voluntary muscle contraction (MVC) force for healthy young and old adults. Data sources Six electronic databases were searched from July 2021 to March 2022. Search terms included: “motor imagery training,” “motor imagery practice,” “mental practice,” “mental training,” “movement imagery,” “cognitive training,” “strength,” “force,” “muscle strength,” “performance,” “enhancement,” “improvement,” “development,” and “healthy adults.” Study selection and data extraction Randomized controlled trials of MIT in enhancing muscle strength with healthy adults were selected. The decision on whether a study met the inclusion criteria of the review was made by two reviewers independently. Any disagreements between the two reviewers were first resolved by discussion between the two reviewers. If consensus could not be reached, then it would be arbitrated by a third reviewer. Data synthesis Twenty-five studies including both internal MIT and external MIT were included in meta-analysis for determining the efficacy of MIT on enhancing muscle strength and 22 internal MIT were used for subgroup analysis for examining dose-response relationship of MIT on MVC. Results MIT demonstrated significant benefit on enhancing muscle strength when compared with no exercise, Effect Size (ES), 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.89–1.30, favoring MIT, but was inferior to physical training (PT), ES, 0.38, 95% CI, 0.15–0.62, favoring PT. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that MIT was more effective for older adults (ES, 2.17, 95% CI, 1.57–2.76) than young adults (ES, 0.95, 95% CI, 0.74–1.17), p = 0.0002, and for small finger muscles (ES, 1.64, 95% CI, 1.06–2.22) than large upper extremity muscles (ES, 0.86, 95% CI, 0.56–1.16), p = 0.02. No significant difference was found in the comparison of small finger muscles and large lower extremity muscles, p = 0.19 although the ES The combination of MIT and PT is equivalent to PT alone in enhancing muscle strength. The subgroup group analysis further suggests that older adults and small finger muscles may benefit more from MIT than young adults and larger muscles. Keywords: motor imagery practice, mental practice, movement imagery, muscle strength, performance, strength enhancement, aging status released display-pdf yes is-olf no is-manuscript no is-preprint no is-journal-matter no is-scanned no is-retracted no Received 2022 Sep 24; Accepted 2022 Dec 5; Collection date 2022. The study by Yue and Cole (1992) included three groups (MIT, physical training, and control groups) and examined not only the MIT effect on improving muscle strength but also neuromuscular mechanisms underlying the MIT-induced strength increase. The young-healthy subjects trained their left hypothenar (little finger abductor) muscles for 4 weeks by either producing real maximal isometric contractions of the muscle (physical training group, In external imagery (EMI; also known as third-person visual imagery), the person sees or visualizes performing the task from outside the body—similar to watching oneself in a mirror performing an exercise ( Herbert et al., 1998 ). Performing IMI generates significantly more physiological responses (i.e., heart rate, blood pressure, and respiration rate) compared to doing EMI ( Ranganathan et al., 2004 ) and is superior to EMI for elevating MVC-related cortical potentials on scalp locations over primary motor (M1) and supplementary motor cortices and for enhancing muscle strength ( Yao et al., 2013 ). Overall, accumulating evidence suggests that MIT is effective in enhancing muscle strength. Thus, the main objective of the current study was to undertake a systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies with either PIV or CBV available, published in peer-reviewed journals or unpublished dissertation or thesis, investigating the beneficial and adverse effects of motor imagery training (MIT) on enhancing muscle strength for both healthy young and older adults. It was hypothesized that both young and older adults should benefit from MIT to enhance their muscle strength. The hypothesis was developed based on the facts that imagery abilities are sustained with aging ( Saimpont et al., 2013 ) and sarcopenia, the age-related decrease in lean muscle mass ( Siparsky et al., 2014 ), makes it feasible to augment old adults’ muscle strength by increasing net excitation of the motoneurons, and increasing activation of prime movers and inhibition of antagonists ( Sale, 1987 ) as the results of MIT. TABLE 2 Training volume variables with the effect size (ES): Motor imagery training * vs. no-exercise control. Key words used were: “motor imagery training,” “motor imagery practice,” “mental practice,” “mental training,” “movement imagery,” “strength,” “force,” “muscle strength,” “performance,” “enhancement,” “improvement,” and “healthy adults.” To find additional articles, the authors hand-searched reference lists of obtained articles (reference and author tracking). The search was terminated on March 15, 2022. To insure effective and accurate search, the titles and abstracts were first analyzed by the two reviewers based on the pre-determined inclusion and exclusion criteria. (2013) 6 Male and Female 18–35 MIT = 6 EMIT = 6 CTRL = 6 Elbow flexion; Isometric 6 5 30 900 MIT 10.5% * EMIT 4.8% CTRL NC Yue and Cole (1992) 6 Male and Female 21–29 MIT = 10 PT = 8 CTRL = 9 Abduction of little finger of the hand 4 5 15 300 MIT 22.03% ** PT 29.75% ** CRTL 3.7% BP, bench press; CTRL, control group; Freq/WK, number of MIT sessions per week; LP, leg press exercise; MIT, motor imagery training; MITABD, MIT with little finger abductor muscle; MITELB, MIT with elbow flexor muscles; N/A, not available; NC, no change; PT, physical training; SD, standard deviation; T/S, number of trials per training session; TT/MIT, total trials in whole study period.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:partial_only:for=0+5p:against=0+0p | v55:multi_partial_one_side:lean=lean_partial:for:one_sided

More for · 4
2024 · cited by 5
Arthrogenic muscle inhibition (AMI) following ACL injury or reconstruction is a common issue that affects muscle activation and functional recovery. Thus, the objective of this study was to systematize the literature on the effects of physiotherapy interventions in the rehabilitation of AMI after ACL injury or reconstruction. A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The risk of bias was evaluated using the PEDro scale and the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Searches were performed in the PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases. Randomized controlled trials involving patients with ACL injuries or ACL reconstruction were included. Twenty studies were included. Fifteen evaluated the effects of exercise, showing significant improvement. Seven studies examined electrotherapy, with neuromuscular electrical stimulation and high-frequency therapy combined with exercise showing improvements in muscle strength, pain, and joint range of motion. Nine studies explored interventions like motor imagery, cryotherapy, taping, and vibration. When performed before exercise, motor imagery and cryotherapy improved cortical activity and muscle recovery. Kinesio taping reduced edema and pain better than exercise alone. Vibration showed inconsistent results across three studies. Methodological quality varied between 5 and 8 on the PEDro scale, with moderate-to-low risk of bias. Structured exercise should be the first-line intervention, but combining it with other therapies enhances rehabilitation. The study protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42023425510). The risk of bias was evaluated using the PEDro scale and the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Searches were performed in the PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases. Randomized controlled trials involving patients with ACL injuries or ACL reconstruction were included. Twenty studies were included. Fifteen evaluated the effects of exercise, showing significant improvement. Seven studies examined electrotherapy, with neuromuscular electrical stimulation and high-frequency therapy combined with exercise showing improvements in muscle strength, pain, and joint range of motion. Nine studies explored interventions like motor imagery, cryotherapy, taping, and vibration. When performed before exercise, motor imagery and cryotherapy improved cortical activity and muscle recovery. Kinesio taping reduced edema and pain better than exercise alone. Vibration showed inconsistent results across three studies. Methodological quality varied between 5 and 8 on the PEDro scale, with moderate-to-low risk of bias. Structured exercise should be the first-line intervention, but combining it with other therapies enhances rehabilitation. The study protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42023425510). neural inhibition AMI quadriceps physiotherapeutic intervention muscle rehabilitation This research received no external funding. Various physiotherapy interventions have been described, including structured exercise, neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), motor imagery, blood flow restriction therapy, and cryotherapy [ 11 , 12 ]. Despite this, there is ongoing debate regarding the role of adjunctive therapies, particularly concerning their efficacy, optimal timing, and potential risks. Some studies suggest benefits in early intervention, while others do not support this [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ], indicating a need for further research to establish clear guidelines. Another study [ 30 ] reported a statistically significant improvement in muscle strength, function, and pain across all groups, with the comparison between groups showing no significant differences ( p > 0.05). This study also showed that combining cryotherapy with exercise did not improve knee extension, range of motion, or edema ( p > 0.05) [ 30 ]. 3.3.2. Motor Imagery Motor imagery is a mental technique widely used by high-level athletes, where individuals visualize a specific movement (motor gesture) to activate the corresponding cortical areas, similar to performing the actual movement [ 51 , 52 ]. This technique can be applied in rehabilitation to facilitate the recovery of motor function, including in musculoskeletal injuries [ 53 , 54 ]. Only one of the included studies in this review used this The most significant result was observed at 150%, where the motor imagery group showed a +4.77 ± 3.1% increase in motor activation compared to a −0.004 ± 0.1% decrease in the control group [ 50 ]. 3.3.3. Kinesio Taping (KT) Three studies assessed the effects of KT combined with standard rehabilitation (pain control, range of motion, proprioception, and muscle strength) on various outcomes, including pain, range of motion, edema, muscle activation, strength, and functionality in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction (ACLR) [ 22 , 36 , 38 ]. Discussion This systematic review underscores the importance of structured exercise as the cornerstone intervention for addressing AMI following ACL injury or reconstruction. However, it is evident from the included studies that combining exercise with adjunctive therapies, such as NMES, cryotherapy, motor imagery, and other non-invasive interventions, results in superior outcomes compared to exercise alone. The heterogeneity in methodologies and interventions across the studies presents a challenge in drawing uniform conclusions. Vibrations can increase the excitability of motoneurons, synchronization of motor units, plasma concentration, testosterone, or growth hormone, which would improve proprioceptive feedback, balance, muscle trophism, or muscle strength when combined with exercises [ 24 , 43 ]. The cost–benefit ratio of vibration therapy, the inconsistencies between studies, and the potential adverse effects mentioned in the studies (increased pain during exercise and joint edema) do not justify the use of vibration therapy in rehabilitation protocols to date. 4.4.
2026 · cited by 0
<h4>Background and purpose</h4>Post-stroke lower limb motor dysfunction significantly impairs activities of daily living (ADL). The present study provides a comparative analysis of various exercise interventions to determine their relative effectiveness in improving lower extremity function and ADL post-stroke.<h4>Methods</h4>We systematically searched six databases for randomized controlled trials published from database inception through December 2024. After quality assessment, a network meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate comparative efficacy, with intervention hierarchies ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).<h4>Results</h4>A total of 12,326 studies were identified, among which 54 randomized controlled trials involving 2104 stroke survivors met inclusion criteria. The key findings revealed distinct optimal interventions for each functional domain. Motor imagery therapy was identified as the most effective approach for lower limb function (SUCRA = 92.5%). For ADL, aquatic exercise showed the highest probability of being the most beneficial intervention (SUCRA = 70.9%). Finally, mirror therapy demonstrated superior efficacy for both balance (SUCRA = 92.8%) and walking endurance (SUCRA = 92.1%).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Multiple exercise interventions demonstrate clinically meaningful benefits for post-stroke lower limb function and ADL performance. Motor imagery therapy may represent the optimal exercise modality for improving lower limb function, while aquatic exercise appears to be the most promising intervention for enhancing ADL. Mirror therapy demonstrated superior efficacy in improving both balance and gait function. These findings provide evidence-based guidance for personalized neurorehabilitation protocols.
2026 · cited by 0
<h4>Objectives</h4>To identify and synthesize evidence on mental imagery (and imagery-based methods) in competitive gymnasts, evaluate effects on performance and relevant psychological/psychophysiological correlates, and appraise methodological quality and important intervention features.<h4>Methods</h4>PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched. Eligible studies included competitive gymnasts from any FIG discipline examining imagery as an intervention/exposure or as an imagery construct associated with performance-relevant outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 for randomized studies and ROBINS-I for non-randomized/observational. Results were synthesized narratively by study design, imagery approach, and outcome domain.<h4>Results</h4>Searches yielded 393 records; 258 unique records were screened; 46 full texts were assessed; and 16 studies were included. Interventions varied (script-based imagery, PETTLEP-informed imagery, video observation plus imagery, and multi-component psychological skills training). Several controlled/quasi-controlled studies reported improved gymnastics-related performance outcomes (judged skill execution or sport-specific performance indices) with imagery-based approaches, whereas others found no performance benefit despite improvements in psychological variables (e.g., self-confidence). Effects appeared moderated by expertise level, sequencing/dose, and outcome choice. Across RoB 2 studies, 0/8 (0%) were overall low risk, 4/8 (50%) had some concerns, and 4/8 (50%) were high risk, with the most frequent domain drivers being randomization process, outcome measurement, and selective reporting. Across ROBINS-I studies, 2/8 (25%) were moderate, 5/8 (62.5%) serious, and 1/8 (12.5%) critical, driven mainly by confounding, then outcome measurement and selective reporting.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Imagery is a potentially useful adjunct to gymnastics training, but effects are inconsistent and implementation- and athlete-dependent. Higher-quality, transparently reported trials using standardized, competition-relevant outcomes are needed.<h4>Systematic review registration</h4>Open Science Framework (osf/io/a9tj6; Date: 25/01/2026).
cited by 0
the following factors affected the effectiveness of mental imagery on muscular activity: low or high EMG activity during mental imagery modulated by imagery perspectives, the intensity of mental effort, weight to be lifted, and activity of the imagined movement. Mental imagery was classified as consisting of internal and external imagery perspectives and their effect on strength performance. Nevertheless, the empirical research findings (60%) indicated that internal imagery was more beneficial for closed skills than external imagery, whereas performance involving open skills might benefit most from external imagery ( Table 3 ). Table 3. Results stratified according to imagery perspectives, training duration and type of skills. Numbers of studies Sum code Imagery perspectives Internal imagery 12 + External imagery 2 ? Training duration Short duration 9 + Long duration 2 ? Open skills Internal imagery 5 ? External imagery 5 + Closed skills Internal imagery 5 + External imagery 5 ? Open in a new tab Concerning EMG activity, the results obtained in the present review showed that internal imagery produces higher EMG activity than external imagery does. The high mental effort resulted in more muscular activity compared to that induced by low mental effort. Furthermore, mental imagery with muscular activity was higher in active than passive muscles, and imagining “lifting a heavy object” resulted in higher EMG activity than imagining “lifting a lighter object”. Finally, self-efficacy, motivation, and imagery ability were the mediator variables in the mental imagery-strength performance relationship ( Table 4 ). Table 4. Results from mediation variables. Number of studies Sum code Imagery ability 11 + Self-efficacy/ self-confidence 2 + Motivation 1 + Open in a new tab Discussion Mental imagery-muscle strength relationship in healthy and patient participants Mental imagery has been reported to induce a performance improvement in skilled movements in a comparable way to phys
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE · 001 Aug 2026
held for human review07 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt