trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Most feed given to livestock consists of byproducts unfit for human consumption

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 4 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Evidence shows that a significant portion of livestock feed consists of human-edible crops like cereals rather than byproducts, refuting the claim.

The analysis

The claim states that most livestock feed consists of byproducts unfit for human consumption. However, multiple papers (such as [3], [8], and [11]) point out that a large share of animal feed is made of cereals and human-edible crops (about one-third of global cereal production). Papers like [5] and [8] discuss shifting livestock to byproducts and grass as a future sustainable strategy, which confirms that current practices still heavily rely on human-edible feed. Therefore, the claim is refuted.

Evidence against · 4
Recorded source metadata

Peter Alexander, Calum Brown, Almut Arneth, John Finnigan, Dominic Moran, Mark Rounsevell. Losses, inefficiencies and waste in the global food system. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.014

States that roughly one-third of total cereal production is currently used in animal feed, meaning a substantial portion of feed consists of human-edible grains rather than byproducts.

See more details
More against · 3
Recorded source metadata

H.H.E. van Zanten, Mario Herrero, Ollie van Hal, Elin Röös, Adrian Müller, Tara Garnett, Pierre Gerber, Christian Schader, I.J.M. de Boer. Defining a land boundary for sustainable livestock consumption. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14321

Discusses livestock eating human-edible biomass like grains, noting that circular systems would reduce this competition, which implies it is not currently the majority practice.

Recorded source metadata

Christian Schader, Adrian Müller, Nadia El‐Hage Scialabba, Judith Hecht, Anne Isensee, Karl‐Heinz Erb, Pete Smith, H.P.S. Makkar, Peter Klocke, Florian Leiber, Patrizia Schwegler, Matthias Stolze, U. Niggli. Impacts of feeding less food-competing feedstuffs to livestock on global food system sustainability. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2015.0891

Explores scenarios where animals are fed only grassland and byproducts, demonstrating that this is a departure from current practices where livestock consume significant human-edible concentrate feeds.

Recorded source metadata

H.P.S. Makkar. Review: Feed demand landscape and implications of food-not feed strategy for food security and climate change. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1017/s175173111700324x

Notes that approximately one-third of global cereal production is used as animal feed, contradicting the idea that most feed is already unfit for human consumption.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → REFUTED · 1701 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt