Trust Me Bro: the receipt

trustme.bro/r/…

✓ checked

trust me, bro:

here is the receipt.

the claim

More than two particles can be entangled in a quantum state

the verdict

SUPPORTED

the evidence backs this

refutedsupported

the weight of evidence

3 sources for · 0 against

Multiple studies and experimental results confirm that more than two particles can be entangled in quantum states, frequently demonstrated using three-photon or multi-atom Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) states.

Evidence for · 3

From Three-Photon Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger States to Ballistic Universal Quantum Computation.

2015 · cited by 45

This paper discusses quantum computing schemes that utilize three-photon Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states, demonstrating multi-particle entanglement.

citation format

See more details

The analysis

The claim is a well-established fact in quantum mechanics regarding multipartite entanglement. Multiple retrieved papers explicitly discuss, generate, or utilize multi-particle entangled states such as three-photon GHZ states and k-partite systems. Therefore, the verdict is SUPPORTED.

More for · 2

Photonic Source of Heralded Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger States.

2024 · cited by 15

The study experimentally demonstrates the generation of polarization-encoded Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states among three photons.

Shortcuts to adiabatic passage for fast generation of Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states by transitionless quantum driving.

2015 · cited by 10

This research constructs shortcuts to create Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states in a three-atom system, confirming multipartite entanglement.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography

first checked04 Aug 2026

judged → SUPPORTED · 8604 Aug 2026

More receipts

Is it true that Phonological evolution involves regular processes of phoneme elision, vowel nasalization, and tonogenesis?Is it true that Hemangiomas are treatable with medication?Is it true that Research identifies forms of intelligence that diverge from standard IQ measures?

Random receipt →The Trust Wiki →

This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: the research is thin, dig deeper

trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt