trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
More than one directly quoted sentence can function as a complement of say
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Linguistics discussion forum evidence indicates that more than one directly quoted sentence can indeed function syntactically as a single complement of the verb 'say'.

Evidence for · 1
cited by 0
# Can more than one directly quoted sentence be a complement of "say"? Tags: syntax - Score: 3 - Views: 101 - Answers: 1 - Answered: yes - Asked by: James Grossmann (8898 rep) - Asked: 2012-04-04 - Edited: 2012-04-04 - Site: linguistics ## Question Can a multi-sentence direct quote be a single complement of "say," "write," etc.? For example, in this utterance... He said "Forget the map. Just find the rascal." ...do the two directly quoted sentences constitute a single complement of the verb "said"? ## Answers ### Answer by Cerberus (score: 4 [ACCEPTED]) Yes, I see no problem, neither with the typography nor with your analysis. You will see that such block quotations are often used in books. As an alternative, you could say that he said is a complete sentence. Then the quotation that follows is seen as syntactically independent, the connection being purely semantic. That would not be my choice, because both the lack of an object to said and the lack of sentence-ending punctuation after it point to a syntactic connection. Then again, punctuation is only punctuation; and it must be admitted that the use of say with direct (quoted) speech is syntactically different from
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Can more than one directly quoted sentence be a complement of "say"?referenceno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE · 005 Aug 2026
held for human review08 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt