trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Moral reasoning can be quantitatively measured
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
13 sources for · 0 against

Peer-reviewed literature demonstrates that moral reasoning can be quantitatively measured using standardized psychological tests like the Defining Issues Test, validated with psychometric models such as Rasch measurement theory, and evaluated through meta-analyses.

Evidence for · 13
2000 · cited by 13
In this study, respondents who agreed to participate in a computer‐administered interview were presented with information and questions about public interest groups, followed by the Defining Issues Test of moral reasoning (DIT). Respondents with high DIT scores stressed morally central over morally peripheral considerations in deciding whether to participate in public interest groups. Less sophisticated reasoners showed the opposite pattern. Morally central considerations also had a much greater impact on the probability that sophisticated respondents would attempt to participate in public interest groups after completing the interview. The analysis included controls for potential confounding variables such as cognitive ability, education, prior political participation, and gender. The findings imply motivational differences between advantaged and disadvantaged population groups. Such differences may help to account for the differing strategies and successes of political organizations mobilizing these groups.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:for=12+1p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

More for · 12
2022 · cited by 5
To support teachers in facilitating students’ moral reasoning development as specified within the Singapore Ministry of Education Character and Citizenship Education curriculum, the Moral Reasoning Questionnaire (MRQ) was developed and underwent preliminary validation. Based upon expert reviews, cognitive interviews and a classical test theory-based factor analytic approach, the development and preliminary validation found evidence (i.e., content appropriateness, response processes and internal structure) to support the validity and reliability of the MRQ. This study aims to extend the validation by examining the purported MRQ items and scale at a deeper level on the Rasch Measurement Theory, given that it is the only model that presents appropriate properties of interval measurement on a log-linear scale. The Rasch analysis found anomalies including differential item functioning and disordered thresholds in the initial set of items. Upon remediation and a second Rasch analysis, the MRQ responses were consistent with that expressed by the Rasch model (i.e., an item with an endorsability higher than what a respondent would tend to endorse would have a lower probability of being endorsed than an item exhibiting an endorsability below what that respondent would tend to endorse) and hence, there was sufficient evidence to support measurement invariance, and that MRQ scores could be concluded to characterise persons invariantly across a continuum.
cited by 0
Delinquency and the development of moral reasoning. A sample of 34 incarcerated male delinquents aged 16-17 and a matched group of controls were compared on self-report measures of delinquency, on Rest's (1975) Defining Issues Test (DIT) of moral reasoning, and on measures of logical operational ability. The mean levels of self-reported delinquency of the incarcerated group were substantially higher than those of the controls. There was no significant difference between the groups in logical operational ability but the mean P score (index of mature moral reasoning) was significantly higher in the control group. However, no relationship was found between moral reasoning and levels of self-reported delinquency. It was concluded that degree and seriousness of involvement of delinquency is unrelated to immaturity of moral reasoning and that the utility of the cognitive developmental approach to moral socialization may therefore be more restricted than has previously been claimed. Published in The British journal of social and clinical psychology (1978)
cited by 0
The moral reasoning of juvenile delinquents: a meta-analysis. To test the hypothesized immaturity of juvenile delinquents' moral reasoning, the results of 15 studies of the moral reasoning of juvenile delinquents were integrated quantitatively using meta-analysis. Hedges and Olkin (1985) methods were used to (a) compute effect sizes, (b) test the homogeneity of the obtained effect sizes, and (c) test the statistical significance of the pooled mean effect size. The results supported the hypothesis that the moral reasoning of juvenile delinquents is immature. It was concluded that several other issues are in need of investigation. Published in Journal of abnormal child psychology (1990)
cited by 0
Challenging misperceptions about nurses' moral reasoning. Discussions in the nursing literature about the usefulness of Kohlberg's theory of moral reasoning for women and nurses, and assertions about the level of moral reasoning scores of nurses have been clouded by inaccuracies and misperceptions. In this article, theoretical and measurement issues related to moral reasoning are clarified and a critical review of the literature is provided about the moral reasoning of nursing students and nurses as measured by the Defining Issues Test (DIT). The review indicates the need for greater rigor in studies of moral reasoning among nurses and the need for accuracy in interpreting and reporting moral reasoning scores. The data show that the moral reasoning of nurses, like that of other groups, tends to increase with formal education. Nurses' scores are usually comparable to, and sometimes higher than, scores of their academic peers. Published in Nursing research
2001 · cited by 0
This meta-analytic article of quantitative studies is aimed at summarizing knowledge gained on ethical practice for the period of 1987 to 1997 and at suggesting directions for future research. It specifically investigated the relationships of education and moral reasoning to ethical practice, with ethical practice as the dependent variable. The sample consisted of eight studies that investigated the relationship between education and ethical practice, and five studies that addressed the relationship between moral reasoning and ethical practice. A small to medium relationship between education and ethical practice was found, with an overall mean for effect sizes, d = .44, p = .000. To test the relationship between moral reasoning and ethical practice the Pearson product moment coefficient r was used as the effect size estimate, as each of the studies in this group reported correlation analyses. A small but significant relationship was found between moral reasoning and ethical practice (overall r of .2, p = .000). These results are evaluated in comparison to those of a decade earlier and overall trends are identified. As before, the majority of the studies are in the form of dissertations, and few of their authors have published their work in the general scientific literature. Similarly, clarity has not yet been achieved with regard to the conceptual and operational definitions of ethical practice. Theoretical, measurement, and policy issues are discussed in highlighting the implications of the study.
1990 · cited by 0
To test the hypothesized immaturity of juvenile delinquents' moral reasoning, the results of 15 studies of the moral reasoning of juvenile delinquents were integrated quantitatively using meta-analysis. Hedges and Olkin (1985) methods were used to (a) compute effect sizes, (b) test the homogeneity of the obtained effect sizes, and (c) test the statistical significance of the pooled mean effect size. The results supported the hypothesis that the moral reasoning of juvenile delinquents is immature. It was concluded that several other issues are in need of investigation.
2000 · cited by 0
C. Gilligan's (1982) critique of L. Kohlberg's theory of moral reasoning and her assertion that two modes of moral reasoning (justice and care) exist have been the subject of debate within the field of psychology for more than 15 years. This meta-analysis was conducted to review quantitatively the work on gender differences in moral orientation. The meta-analysis revealed small differences in the care orientation favoring females (d = -.28) and small differences in the justice orientation favoring males (d = .19). Together, the moderator variables accounted for 16% of the variance in the effect sizes for care reasoning and 17% of the variance in the effect sizes for justice reasoning. These findings do not offer strong support for the claim that the care orientation is used predominantly by women and that the justice orientation is used predominantly by men.
2014 · cited by 0
Human morality has been investigated using a variety of tasks ranging from judgments of hypothetical dilemmas to viewing morally salient stimuli. These experiments have provided insight into neural correlates of moral judgments and emotions, yet these approaches reveal important differences in moral cognition. Moral reasoning tasks require active deliberation while moral emotion tasks involve the perception of stimuli with moral implications. We examined convergent and divergent brain activity associated with these experimental paradigms taking a quantitative meta-analytic approach. A systematic search of the literature yielded 40 studies. Studies involving explicit decisions in a moral situation were categorized as active (n = 22); studies evoking moral emotions were categorized as passive (n = 18). We conducted a coordinate-based meta-analysis using the Activation Likelihood Estimation to determine reliable patterns of brain activity. Results revealed a convergent pattern of reliable brain activity for both task categories in regions of the default network, consistent with the social and contextual information processes supported by this brain network. Active tasks revealed more reliable activity in the temporoparietal junction, angular gyrus and temporal pole. Active tasks demand deliberative reasoning and may disproportionately involve the retrieval of social knowledge from memory, mental state attribution, and construction of the context through associative processes. In contrast, passive tasks reliably engaged regions associated with visual and emotional information processing, including lingual gyrus and the amygdala. A laterality effect was observed in dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, with active tasks engaging the left, and passive tasks engaging the right. While overlapping activity patterns suggest a shared neural network for both tasks, differential activity suggests that processing of moral input is affected by task demands. The results provide novel insight into distinct features of moral cognition, including the generation of moral context through associative processes and the perceptual detection of moral salience.
cited by 0
would justify their actions if placed in similar moral dilemmas. He analyzed the form of moral reasoning displayed, rather than its conclusion and classified Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development constitute an adaptation of a psychological theory originally conceived by the Swiss psychologist Jean Piaget. Kohlberg began work on this topic as a psychology graduate student at the University of Chicago in 1958 and expanded upon the theory throughout his life. The theory holds that moral reasoning, a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for e Other psychologists have questioned the assumption that moral action is primarily a result of formal reasoning. Social intuitionists such as Jonathan Haidt argue that individuals often make moral judgments without weighing concerns such as fairness, law, human rights or ethical values. Thus the arguments analyzed by Kohlberg and other rationalist psychologists could be considered post hoc rationalizations of intuitive decisions; moral reasoning may be less relevant to moral action than Kohlberg's theory suggests.
1986 · cited by 0
and tech- nology can be altered so that these facets of social life can be merged. Although … phenomena (for example, thinking and moral reasoning) can be computed or calculated experimentally … on the notion that education can be quantitatively measured. Rather than collect quantitative
2026 · cited by 0
This study aims to systematically analyze the role of ethical climate and moral reasoning in accounting fraud through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach. This topic is important because accounting fraud is influenced not only by weak internal control systems, but also by the ethical environment within an organization and the quality of an individual’s moral reasoning. The literature search was conducted through Google Scholar, Garuda, SINTA, and Scopus databases with the assistance of Publish or Perish using the keywords ethical climate, moral reasoning, and accounting fraud. The findings show that ethical climate plays a role in reducing accounting fraud, although its effect tends to be indirect and contextual, particularly through strengthening whistleblowing, fraud prevention, and limiting the pressure and opportunity that may encourage fraudulent behavior. Meanwhile, moral reasoning demonstrates a more consistent relationship, indicating that the higher an individual’s moral reasoning, the lower the tendency to engage in accounting fraud. These findings confirm that the prevention of accounting fraud requires the integration of a strong organizational ethical climate and high individual moral quality. This study implies that fraud prevention efforts should not rely solely on formal control systems, but should also be supported by strengthening the organization’s ethical culture and developing the moral reasoning of human resources.
cited by 0
impulse; while the “ moral arithmetic” with which he compares pleasures and pains, and endeavours to make the notion of happiness quantitatively precise, is an
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt