trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Mongol siege equipment was highly effective in warfare
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 0 against

Historical references and literature confirm that Mongol logistical support and siege equipment were highly effective in warfare against walled cities.

Evidence for · 2
2009 · cited by 6
AbstractThis article discusses the Mongol approach to warfare, then goes on to consider the Mongols' conversion to the notion that they would have to develop a siege train, since walled cities cannot easily be taken by a cavalry charge. The contribution of Chinese siege engineers is discussed, and there is a survey of Chinese siege techniques as they evolved before the Mongol period. The author considers the evidence for the use of inflammable materials, and then moves to the question of gunpowder. The widespread (not quite universal) consensus that the Chinese used gunpowder is discussed, and then attention moves to Hulegu's expedition to western Asia in the 1250s. It is pointed out that none of the major sources seems to imply the use of anything that might be construed as gunpowder technology during those campaigns. Lastly, the author considers, in some detail, sieges conducted by the Ilkhanid Mongols against Mamluk border strongholds during the succeeding decades, drawing attention to and explaining those sieges' increasing lack of success. Mongol Siege Warfare on the Banks of the Euphrates and the Question of Gunpowder (1260–1312) | Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society | Cambridge Core Search Institution Login Search Hostname: page-component-66d9dcfd78-njmxx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-08-08T02:11:56.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false Home > Journals > Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society > Volume 19 Issue 3 > Mongol Siege Warfare on the Banks of the Euphrates... English Français Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society Article contents Abstract Footnotes References Mongol Siege Warfare on the Banks of the Euphrates and the Question of Gunpowder (1260–1312) Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 July 2009 Kate Raphael Show author details Kate Raphael* Affiliation: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Article Metrics Article contents Abstract Footnotes References Get access Share Cite Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window] Abstract This article discusses the Mongol approach to warfare, then goes on to consider the Mongols' conversion to the notion that they would have to develop a siege train, since walled cities cannot easily be taken by a cavalry charge. The contribution of Chinese siege engineers is discussed, and there is a survey of Chinese siege techniques as they evolved before the Mongol period. The author considers the evidence for the use of inflammable materials, and then moves to the question of gunpowder. The widespread (not quite universal) consensus that the Chinese used gunpowder is discussed, and then attention moves to Hulegu's expedition to western Asia in the 1250s. It is pointed out that none of the major sources seems to imply the use of anything that might be construed as gunpowder technology during those campaigns. 127 Google Scholar . 18 18 Franke , H. , “Siege and Defense of Towns in Medieval China”, in Chinese Ways in Warfare , eds. Kierman , F. A. , and Fairbank , J. K. ( Cambridge, Mass. , 1974 ), pp. 169 , 195 Google 59 59 Rashid al-Din, Jami al-tawarikh (Thackston), II, pp. 507–509; Patton , D. , Badr al-Din Lulu, Atabeg of Mosul, 1211–1259 ( Seattle , 1991 ), p. 63 Google Scholar . 60 60 The following Mongol sieges are described in great detail by P. Thorau, The Lion of Egypt . Trans. P. M. Holt, (London and New-York, 1992) and by Amitai-Preiss , R. , Mongols and Mamluks: The Mamluk- Ilkhanid War 1260–1281 ( Cambridge , 1995 ) CrossRef Google Scholar . 61 61 Thorau , P. , The Lion of Egypt . Translated by Holt , P. M. ( London and New-York , 1992 ), p. 64 Google Scholar ; Humphries, Saladin , p. 348. 62 62 Amitai-Preiss , R. Serie orientale, CrossRef Google Scholar Roy, Kaushik 2022. A Global History of Warfare and Technology . p. 75. CrossRef Google Scholar Ryan-Despraz, Jessica 2023. Behaviour in Our Bones . p. 109. CrossRef Google Scholar May, Timothy 2023. The Cambridge History of the Mongol Empire . p. 460. CrossRef Google Scholar Roy, Kaushik 2024. Eine globale Geschichte von Kriegsführung und Technologie . p. 87. CrossRef Google Scholar Google Scholar Citations View all Google Scholar citations for this article. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply. Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service. Mongol Siege Warfare on the Banks of the Euphrates and the Question of Gunpowder (1260–1312) Volume 19, Issue 3 Kate Raphael (a1) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1356186309009717 Your Kindle email address Please provide your Kindle email. @free.kindle.com @kindle.com ( service fees apply ) Available formats PDF Please select a format to save. Mongol Siege Warfare on the Banks of the Euphrates and the Question of Gunpowder (1260–1312) Volume 19, Issue 3 Kate Raphael (a1) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1356186309009717 Available formats PDF Please select a format to save. By using this service, you agree that you will only keep content for personal use, and will not openly distribute them via Dropbox, Google Drive or other file sharing services Please confirm that you accept the terms of use. Cancel Save × Save article to Google Drive To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive . Mongol Siege Warfare on the Banks of the Euphrates and the Question of Gunpowder (1260–1312) Volume 19, Issue 3 Kate Raphael (a1) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1356186309009717 Available formats PDF Please select a format to save. By using this service, you agree that you will only keep content for personal use, and will not openly distribute them via Dropbox, Google Drive or other file sharing services Please confirm that you accept the terms of use.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+1p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

More for · 1
2017 · cited by 0
... Mongol culture and way of life provided a ready - made manpower pool of trained warriors used to extensive travel over large areas . Mongol logistical support was highly effective ... siege equipment . Moreover , the Mongol tsunami method ... War was a central theme in the world history of the late fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, with military capability and activity central to its states, societies, economies and cultures. War in the World 1450–1600 provides an account of warfare in the period, placing it in global context. It offers a corrective to a narrative that has emphasised European developments and obscured the history of non-European military systems and cultures of war. Highlighting conflict between non-Western powers, which constituted most of the conflict around the world, as well as giving due attention to warfare between Western and non-Western powers, Black emphasises the breadth and variety of military trajectories and connections. This comparative context also provides a framework for considering the idea o War in the World: A Comparative History, 1450-1600 by Jeremy Black - Books on Google Play War in the World: A Comparative History, 1450-1600 Jeremy Black Sep 2017 · Bloomsbury Publishing Ebook 264 Pages Rp 774.629 Rp 542.240 Buy Free sample Add to wishlist War was a central theme in the world history of the late fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, with military capability and activity central to its states, societies, economies and cultures. War in the World 1450–1600 provides an account of warfare in the period, placing it in global context. It offers a corrective to a narrative that has emphasised European developments and obscured the history of non-European military systems and cultures of war. Highlighting conflict between non-Western powers, which constituted most of the conflict around the world, as well as giving due attention to warfare between Western and non-Western powers, Black emphasises the breadth and variety of military trajectories and connections. This comparative context also provides a framework for considering the idea of a European-based Military Revolution. A wide-ranging account of world military history in a period of substantial development, the book will be essential reading for those interested in global history and conflict. War in the World 1450–1600 is designed as a companion volume to Jeremy Black's Beyond the Military Revolution: Warfare in the Seventeenth-Century World . War was a central theme in the world history of the late fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, with military capability and activity central to its states, societies, economies and cultures. War in the World 1450–1600 provides an account of warfare in the period, placing it in global context. It off...
Everything we examined (3) — 2 independent sources
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Mongol Siege Warfare on the Banks of the Euphrates and the Question of Gunpowder (1260–1312)peer-reviewedsame source L1no side taken
  2. Mongol Siege Warfare on the Banks of the Euphrates and the Question of Gunpowder (1260–1312)peer-reviewedsame source L1no side taken
  3. War in the Worldreferenceno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
held for human review08 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt