trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Meteorology models of Venus are in advanced stages of development incorporating superrotation dynamics
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
8 sources for · 0 against

Multiple peer-reviewed studies and climate model simulations demonstrate that advanced general circulation models successfully reproduce and analyze the atmospheric superrotation dynamics of Venus.

Evidence for · 8
2004 · cited by 51
A 4‐day superrotation 60‐times faster than the planetary rotation (243 days) is observed in Venus' atmosphere. Although it has been difficult to reproduce the extraordinary phenomenon in GCMs, the superrotation is reproduced by meridional circulation and planetary‐scale waves with phase velocities slower than 50 m s−1 in our improved GCM. Thermally induced waves produce equatorward momentum fluxes in the middle atmosphere, while the planetary‐scale pattern of two different gravity and Rossby waves with the same frequency is found to produce the equatorward momentum flux in the lower atmosphere. These processes play crucial roles in dynamics of the simulated Venus superrotation.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:for=4+4p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

More for · 7
2013 · cited by 21
The centrifugal force associated with the superrotation in Venus' and Titan's middle atmosphere reduces the effective gravity and thereby modifies the shape of the geopotential surface, which manifests itself as an equatorial bulge. General circulation models (GCMs) based on the hydrostatic primitive equations cannot correctly represent this dynamics since the vertical component of the centrifugal force does not appear in the hydrostatic equation. Consequently, they are likely to underestimate the poleward pressure gradient force and superrotation in gradient wind balance. This effect can be accounted for in nonhydrostatic GCMs or in quasi‐hydrostatic GCMs, in which the hydrostatic equation is supplemented by the vertical component of the centrifugal and Coriolis force and which do not make the shallow‐atmosphere approximation. A quasi‐hydrostatic GCM is shown to predict faster superrotation than a hydrostatic GCM run under otherwise identical conditions.
2022 · cited by 7
Abstract Described here is a concept for a variable-altitude aerobot mission to Venus developed as part of the 2020 NASA Planetary Science Summer School in collaboration with NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory. The Venus Air and Land Expedition: a Novel Trailblazer for in situ Exploration (VALENTInE) is a long-duration New Frontiers–class mission to Venus in alignment with the goals recommended by the 2013 Planetary Science Decadal Survey. VALENTInE would have five science objectives: (1) determine the driving force of atmospheric superrotation, (2) determine the source of D/H and noble gas inventory, (3) determine the properties that govern how light is reflected within the lower cloud later, (4) determine whether the tesserae are felsic, and (5) determine whether there is evidence of a recent dynamo preserved in the rock record. The proposed mission concept has a total duration of 15 Earth days and would float at an altitude of 55 km, along with five dips to a lower altitude of 45 km to study Venus’s lower atmosphere. The instrument payload allows for measurements of the atmosphere, surface, and interior of Venus and includes six instruments: an atmospheric weather suite, a mass spectrometer, a multispectral imager, a near-infrared spectrometer, light detection and ranging, and a magnetometer. Principle challenges included a limitation caused by battery lifetime and low technology readiness levels for aerobots that can survive the harsh conditions of Venus’s atmosphere. This preliminary mission was designed to fit within an assumed New Frontiers 5 (based on inflated New Frontiers 4) cost cap.
2018 · cited by 7
Since insertion into orbit on December 7, 2015, the Akatsuki orbiter has returned global images of Venus from its four imaging cameras at eleven discrete wavelengths from ultraviolet (283 and 365 nm) and near infrared (0.9-2.3 µm), to the thermal infrared (8-12 µm) from a near-equatorial orbit. The Venus Express and Pioneer Venus Orbiter missions have also monitored the planet for long periods but from polar or near-polar orbits. The wavelength coverage and views of the planet also differ for all three missions. In reflected light, the images reveal features seen near the cloud tops (~ 70 km altitude), whereas in the near-infrared images of the nightside, features seen are at mid- to lower cloud levels (~ 48-60 km altitude). The dayside cloud cover imaged at the ultraviolet wavelengths shows morphologies similar to what was observed from Mariner 10, Pioneer Venus, Galileo, Venus Express and MESSENGER. The daytime images at 0.9 and 2.02 µm also reveal some interesting features which bear similarity to the ultraviolet images. The nighttime images at 1.74, 2.26 and 2.32 µm and at 8-12 µm reveal features not seen before and show new details of the nightside including narrow wavy ribbons, curved string-like features, long-scale waves, long dark streaks, isolated bright spots, sharp boundaries and even mesoscale vortices. Some features previously seen such as circum-equatorial belts (CEBs) and occasional areal brightenings at ultraviolet (seen in Venus Express observations) of the cloud cover at ultraviolet wavelengths have not been observed thus far. Evidence for the hemispheric vortex organization of the global circulation can be seen at all wavelengths on the day- and nightsides. Akatsuki images reveal new and puzzling morphology of the complex nightside cloud cover. The cloud morphologies provide some clues to the processes occurring in the atmosphere and are thus, a key diagnostic tool when quantitative dynamical analysis is not feasible due to insufficient information.
2019 · cited by 4
Cloud patterns are important clues for revealing the atmospheric circulation of Venus. Recently, a planetary-scale streak structure has been discovered in middle- and lower-cloud images of Venus' night-side taken by IR2, the 2-μm camera, on board the Akatsuki orbiter. However, its formation mechanism has not been investigated. Here we succeed, for the first time, in reproducing the patterns of the observed streak structure, as regions of strong downward flows that develop in high-resolution global simulations of the Venus atmosphere. The streaks are formed in both hemispheres with equatorial symmetry, which is caused by equatorial Rossby-like and Kelvin-like waves with zonal wavenumber one. The low-stability layer that has been suggested by past observations is essential for reproducing the streak structure. The streaks of downward flow result from the interaction of the meridionally tilted phase lines of the Rossby-like waves and the characteristics of baroclinic instability produced around the low-stability layer.
2017 · cited by 3
The size and mass of Venus is similar to those of the Earth; however, its atmospheric dynamics are considerably different and they are poorly understood due to limited observations and computational difficulties. Here, we developed a data assimilation system based on the local ensemble transform Kalman filter (LETKF) for a Venusian Atmospheric GCM for the Earth Simulator (VAFES), to make full use of the observational data. To examine the validity of the system, two datasets were assimilated separately into the VAFES forecasts forced with solar heating that excludes the diurnal component Qz; one was created from a VAFES run forced with solar heating that includes the diurnal component Qt, whereas the other was based on observations made by the Venus Monitoring Camera (VMC) onboard the Venus Express. The VAFES-LETKF system rapidly reduced the errors between the analysis and forecasts. In addition, the VAFES-LETKF system successfully reproduced the thermal tide excited by the diurnal component of solar heating, even though the second datasets only included horizontal winds at a single altitude on the dayside with a long interval of approximately one Earth day. This advanced system could be useful in the analysis of future datasets from the Venus Climate Orbiter 'Akatsuki'.
2011 · cited by 0
Atmospheric superrotation is known to exist on Venus where the cloud cover, at 70 km above the surface, rotates about 60 times faster than the solid planet. Superrotation is strongly suspected on Titan on the basis of numerical studies and observations. The numerical simulation of superrotation is described. It is shown how the general circulation models, originally developed for terrestrial meteorology and climatology, can be used to infer the circulation in such atmospheres. The emphasis is on the case of Titan for which a specific general circulation model was developed.
2025 · cited by 0
Venus’s cloud-top superrotation, characterized by equatorial zonal winds of ~100 m/s, is sustained by the atmospheric angular momentum (AM) induced by atmospheric waves, especially thermal tides, and meridional circulation. However, the overall patterns of thermal tides and their individual components’ contribution to superrotation remain poorly understood. Recent Akatsuki observations and semispectral model simulations suggest that the semidiurnal tide is the dominant driving force behind cloud-top superrotation. Using a 16-year radio occultation dataset observed by Venus Express and Akatsuki, we have, for the first time, revealed the thermal tide structure from the cloud base to mesopause (50-90 km) in the southern hemisphere and validated the tidal patterns simulated by the Venus Planetary Climate Model. The simulation indicates that diurnal tide-induced AM flux divergence is the primary driving force for the equatorial cloud-top superrotation, contrary to the previously held belief that the semidiurnal tide was dominant.
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt