Metal melting points are determined by the strength of metallic bonding
the verdict
CONTESTED
contested - the weight sits with the supporting side
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 0 against
The retrieved sources discuss metallic bonding models and ultra-high-temperature ceramics, but they do not provide direct evidence establishing that metal melting points are determined solely by the strength of metallic bonding.
The "Sea of Electrons" theory stands today only as an oversimplified model of how metallic bonding works. In a molten metal, the metallic bond is still present, although the ordered structure has been broken down. The metallic bond is not fully broken until the metal boils. That means that boiling point is actually a better guide to the strength of the metallic bond than melting point is. On melting, the bond is loosened, not broken. The strength of a metallic bond depends on three things:
- The number of electrons that become delocalized from the metal
- The charge of the cation (metal). - The size of the cation. A strong metallic bond will be the result of more delocalized electrons, which causes the effective nuclear charge on electrons on the cation to increase, in effect making the size of the cation smaller. Metallic bonds are strong and require a great deal of energy to break, and therefore metals have high melting and boiling points. A metallic bonding theory must explain how so much bonding can occur with such few electrons (since metals are located on the left side of the periodic table and do not have many electrons in their valence shells).