trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Men are genetically programmed to seek multiple sexual partners more than women

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Evolutionary psychology and sexual strategies theory support the premise that men evolved a greater inclination toward short-term mating and partner novelty due to differential parental investment.

The analysis

The claim is a specific, testable hypothesis grounded in evolutionary psychology and sexual strategies theory. Multiple retrieved papers support the theoretical framework and empirical findings that men exhibit a greater tendency toward short-term mating strategies and a preference for partner novelty compared to women, driven by lower obligatory parental investment. No papers refute the claim.

Evidence for · 3
Recorded source metadata

D M Buss, D P Schmitt. Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating.. 1993. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.100.2.204

Sexual strategies theory posits that men and women evolved distinct psychological mechanisms and preferences for short-term and long-term mating contexts.

See more details
More for · 2
Recorded source metadata

Heather Morton, Boris B Gorzalka. Role of Partner Novelty in Sexual Functioning: A Review.. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2014.958788

Evidence suggests that sexual desire and arousal increase in response to partner novelty, an effect that tends to be more pronounced in men.

Recorded source metadata

A Troisi. Sexual disorders in the context of Darwinian psychiatry.. 2003. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12834022/

Parental investment theory predicts that men are more prone to a promiscuous mating strategy while women are more discriminative.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked31 Jul 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7531 Jul 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt