trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Medieval and Renaissance court jesters commonly had physical disabilities
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Historical sources indicate that dwarf jesters were very popular in medieval and Renaissance European courts.

Evidence for · 1
2006 · cited by 0
... court jesters, to name but two dominant stereotypes – which even the otherwise exceptional work by Stiker does.56 ... Renaissance' is seen to take the position of 'Enlightenment'). In this respect Foucault has a lot to answer for ... This impressive volume presents a thorough examination of all aspects of physical impairment and disability in medieval Europe. Examining a popular era that is of great interest to many historians and researchers, Irene Metzler presents a theoretical framework of disability and explores key areas such as: medieval theoretical concepts theology and natural philosophy notions of the physical body medical theory and practice. Bringing into play the modern day implications of medieval thought on the issue, this is a fascinating and informative addition to the research studies of medieval history, history of medicine and disability studies scholars the English-speaking world over.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+1p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (2) — 1 independent source
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Disability in Medieval Europereferencesame source L1no side taken
  2. Reader in Comedyreferencesame source L1no side taken
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt