trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Medical laboratories determine accuracies for their blood tests

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
7 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Medical laboratories routinely perform validation, precision, and performance evaluations to determine the accuracy of their diagnostic blood and fluid tests.

The analysis

The retrieved papers consistently demonstrate that medical and clinical laboratories conduct analytical validations, performance evaluations, and method comparisons to determine the accuracy and reliability of various blood tests and diagnostic assays.

Evidence for · 7
Recorded source metadata

David H Wilson, D. Chan, Lei Chang, Robert Mathis, I. Verberk, X. Montalban, M. Comabella, N. Fissolo, B. Bielekova, R. Masvekar, Tanuja Chitnis, Tjalf Ziemssen, Katja Akgün, K. Blennow, H. Zetterberg, Wolfgang Brück, G. Giovannoni, S. Gnanapavan, S. Bittner, F. Zipp, G. Comi, Roberto Furlan, Sylvain Lehmann, S. Thebault, M. Freedman, A. Bar-Or, M. Kramer, Markus Otto, S. Halbgebauer, K. Hrusovsky, T. Plavina, M. Khalil, F. Piehl, H. Wiendl, L. Kappos, A. Maceski, Eline Willemse, D. Leppert, C. Teunissen, J. Kuhle. Development and multi-center validation of a fully automated digital immunoassay for neurofilament light chain: toward a clinical blood test for neuronal injury. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-0518

This study evaluates the analytical performance and multi-center validation of a clinical blood test.

See more details
More for · 6
Recorded source metadata

Moritz Waldecker, Schessler Katherina, Bömicke Wolfgang, Rammelsberg Peter, Rues Stefan. In-vitro validation of a new method to assess the clinical accuracy of complete arch impressions. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06236-1

This paper evaluates an in vitro method to assess the clinical accuracy of diagnostic dental impressions.

Recorded source metadata

S. Moon, H. Choi, Serim Kim, Kyunghoon Lee, Sang-Guk Lee, S. Song, Soo-Youn Lee, H. Park. Recommendations for Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry in the Clinical Laboratory: Part II. Method Validation. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3343/lmo.2020.10.2.95

This study outlines essential validation guidelines for determining accuracy in clinical laboratory testing.

Recorded source metadata

M. Hossen, Nee Edirisinghe, B. Fleiss, Rosita Zakaria. Basics of Method Evaluation in Clinical Laboratory Testing: A Mini-Review. 2024. https://doi.org/10.33176/aacb-24-00001

This review highlights that accuracy and method evaluation are essential components of clinical laboratory testing.

Recorded source metadata

McInerney M, Hurley B, Barkow J, Menning K, Nicolace J, Schauer J, Van de Water J, Wassman ER. Analytical Validation of an ELISA Assay for Maternal Autoantibody-Related Autism.. 2026. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16111665

This paper reports on the analytical validation, sensitivity, and specificity of assays transferred to a clinical laboratory.

Recorded source metadata

Tembo D, Kaphika JS, Ahmadu A, Alufandika L, Kalilangwe V, Kukacha C, Kaphika D, Lipenga FT, Machonjo M, Manda S, Masina M, Mchoma EC, Mnyanga AC, Moyo IM, Mutala FP, Mzumara P, Shani D, Selemani GP, Denis B. Implementing and Transitioning a Laboratory Quality Management System from ISO 15189:2012 to ISO 15189:2022: Experience from the Malawi-Liverpool Wellcome Research Programme, Blantyre.. 2026. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.25356.2

This paper describes quality management systems and test method verification in clinical laboratories.

Recorded source metadata

Kim H, Kim DY, Kim H. Analytical performance evaluation and method comparison of the 1copy BCR::ABL1 qPCR assay for monitoring chronic myeloid leukemia.. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2026.e00538

This study evaluates the analytical performance and accuracy of a quantitative PCR assay for clinical monitoring.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8301 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt