Macroeconomic models assume technological change is labor-augmenting to achieve balanced growth
Macroeconomic growth models frequently assume that technological change is labor-augmenting in order to maintain a stable balanced growth path and consistent factor income shares.
The claim is a specific, well-established premise in macroeconomic theory regarding how growth models are constructed to yield steady-state balanced growth. Papers [0], [1], and [4] all explicitly discuss or utilize the standard macroeconomic assumption of labor-augmenting technical change (or examine its necessity for steady-state growth), directly supporting the claim. No papers refute it.
Andreas Irmen, Amer Tabakovic. Endogenous capital- and labor-augmenting technical change in the neoclassical growth model. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2017.05.002
Paper [0] confirms that macroeconomic growth models commonly extend neoclassical frameworks to examine endogenous capital- and labor-augmenting technical change.
See more details
Andreas Irmen. A GENERALIZED STEADY-STATE GROWTH THEOREM. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1365100516000407
Paper [1] acknowledges that technical change is standardly modeled as purely labor-augmenting in dynamic macroeconomics to achieve steady-state balanced growth, while discussing its mathematical foundations.
Daron Acemoglu. Labor- and Capital-Augmenting Technical Change. 2003. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.372820
Paper [4] notes that long-run macroeconomic growth models assume labor-augmenting technical change to maintain a constant labor share in GDP.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
Challenge the receipt
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt