trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Liberal people are more intelligent than conservative people
the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
3 sources for · 0 against

The retrieved scientific literature contains mixed findings regarding the relationship between cognitive ability and political ideology, with some studies indicating positive associations between intelligence and liberalism while others report positive associations with economic conservatism.

Evidence for · 3
2025 · cited by 0
We investigate why people believe disinformation about health-related issues. Acting on disinformation could lead to severe injuries and even death. Five hundred eight American respondents each reviewed 10 different social media posts about health-related topics, and 60% of the posts contained disinformation. They were asked to evaluate the posts for their honesty and explain their decisions. Respondents successfully detected disinformation about 2/3 of the time. Across all participant responses, need for cognition was the only factor important to successful detection of disinformation. When investigating each social media post individually, need for cognition was key for 35% of the posts, while political affiliation was key for 15%. Neither factor was important for the remaining 50% of posts. People with a high need for cognition were adept at detecting online disinformation, but those with conservative political affiliations were not. Those best suited to detecting health-related disinformation either had a high need for cognition or a liberal political affiliation.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:partial_only:for=0+3p:against=0+0p | v55:multi_partial_one_side:lean=lean_partial:for:one_sided

More for · 2
cited by 0
More than [Formula: see text] : Verbal and performance IQ as predictors of socio-political attitudes - PubMed Save Email Send to Display options Full text links Cite Display options ## Abstract Measures of intelligence predict socio-political attitudes and behaviors, such as liberalism, religiosity, and voter turnout. Little, however, is known about which cognitive abilities are responsible for these relationships. Employing several cohorts from the Minnesota Center for Twin and Family Research, we test the predictive performance of different broad abilities. Using multiple regression to compare verbal and performance IQ from Wechsler intelligence tests, we find verbal IQ more strongly predicts voter turnout, civic engagement, traditionalism, and measures of ideology. On average, the correlation between verbal IQ and our socio-political attitudes is twice as large as that of performance IQ. The same pattern appears after controlling for education and after performing the analysis within sibling pairs. This implies that the relationship cannot be entirely mediated through education, nor entirely confounded by upbringing. Positive and negative controls are employed to test the
cited by 0
Why Liberals and Atheists Are More Intelligent - Satoshi Kanazawa, 2010 [Skip to main content](#skipNavigationTo) Intended for healthcare professionals [![Sage Journals Home](https://journals.sagepub.com/pb-assets/UX3/Images/logo-new-1685528515400.svg%20)](https://journals.sagepub.com/) [Search this journal**](#) * [Search this journal](#pane-91a67f5d-48d7-493e-912e-2af5faaaceef0) * [Search all journals](#pane-91a67f5d-48d7-493e-912e-2af5faaaceef1) Enter search terms... SearchSearch**[Advanced search](https://journals.sagepub.com/search/advanced?SeriesKey=spqc) Enter search terms... SearchSearch**[Advanced search](https://journals.sagepub.com/search/advanced?SeriesKey=spqc) * [****Search](#) * [****Access/ProfileAccess](#) * [View access options](https://journals.sagepub.com/action/showLogin?uri=/doi/abs/10.1177/0190272510361602) * [View profile](https://journals.sagepub.com/action/showLogin?uri=/doi/abs/10.1177/0190272510361602) * [Create profile](https://journals.sagepub.com/action/registration) * [ **Cart0 ](https://journals.sagepub.com/action/showCart?FlowID=1&alt=Empty+cart) [Close Drawer MenuOpen Drawer MenuMenu](#main1) [Social Psychology Quarterly](https://journals.sagepub.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → CONTESTED · 3505 Aug 2026
held for human review08 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt