trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Leonhard Euler made the algebraic error multiplying square roots of negative numbers

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Historical sources and mathematical discussions confirm that Leonhard Euler wrote out the multiplication of square roots of negative numbers in a way that modern mathematicians call an error, though it aligned with his own definitions at the time.

How claims like this are judged

Judged against reference works: claims of this kind are settled by the historical reference record, not journal abstracts.

Evidence for · 2
Recorded source metadata

tandfonline.com: Euler's “Mistake”? The Radical Product Rule in Historical Perspective. tandfonline.com. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00029890.2007.11920416

The article title explicitly addresses Euler's alleged mistake with the radical product rule.

See more details
More for · 1
Recorded source metadata

skeptics.stackexchange.com: Did Euler make the elementary mistake √-2 √-3 = √6?. skeptics.stackexchange.com. https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/47874/did-euler-make-the-elementary-mistake-%e2%88%9a-2-%e2%88%9a-3-%e2%88%9a6

Confirms Euler wrote that expression, though notes it followed his own definitions.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked31 Jul 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7531 Jul 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt