trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Kant uses the term noumena to refer to objects of non-sensible intuition.
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
0 sources for · 1 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Scholarly sources clarify that Kant does not define noumena as objects of a non-sensible intuition, but rather treats that notion as an illegitimate positive usage or a hypothetical formulation that he rejects.

Evidence against · 1
2021 · cited by 0
Various Authors. of the concept is not Kant's . All that Kant says is that if we under- stand by ' noumenon ' an object of a non - sensible intuition , then we use the concept in a positive way ; and if we understand by it only whatever is ... This set reissues 6 books on the German philosopher Immanuel Kant originally published between 1938 and 1990. The volumes examine Kant’s most well-known essays, including the Critique of Pure Reason, and attempt to explain Kant’s arguments by expressing them in a more modern idiom. This set will be of particular interest to students of philosophy.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:refuted:single_source:for=0+0p:against=1+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (2) — 1 independent source
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Routledge Library Editions: Kantreferencesame source L1no side taken
  2. The World According to Kantreferencesame source L1no side taken
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt