trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Kant argued that lies by omission are morally permissible
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
0 sources for · 1 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Scholarly literature indicates that Immanuel Kant maintained that telling a lie is never morally permissible, directly contradicting the claim that he argued lies by omission are permissible.

Evidence against · 1
cited by 0
Kant on Lies, Candour and Reticence | Kantian Review | Cambridge Core Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage. Search Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage. --- Institution Login Search Hostname: page-component-74d7c59bfc-hfsb5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-01-26T14:05:21.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false - Français - English # Kant on Lies, Candour and Reticence Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 March 2011 James Edwin Mahon Show author details --- --- Article contents - References - Extract Get access Share Cite Rights & Permissions --- ## Extract Like several prominent moral philosophers before him, such as St Augustine and St Thomas Aquinas, Kant held that it is never morally permissible to tell a lie. Although a great deal has been written on why and how he argued for this conclusion, comparatively little has been written on what, precisely, Kant considered a lie to be, and on how he differentiated between being truthful and being candid, between telling a lie and being reticent, and between telling a lie and other forms of
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:refuted:single_source:for=0+0p:against=1+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Kant on Lies, Candour and Reticence | Kantian Review | Cambridge Corereferenceno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE · 005 Aug 2026
held for human review08 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt