Kant argued that lies by omission are morally permissible
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
0 sources for · 1 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says
Scholarly literature indicates that Immanuel Kant maintained that telling a lie is never morally permissible, directly contradicting the claim that he argued lies by omission are permissible.
Kant on Lies, Candour and Reticence | Kantian Review | Cambridge Core
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.
Search
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.
---
Institution Login
Search
Hostname: page-component-74d7c59bfc-hfsb5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-01-26T14:05:21.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
- Français
- English
# Kant on Lies, Candour and Reticence
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 March 2011
James Edwin Mahon
Show author details
---
---
Article contents
- References
- Extract
Get access
Share
Cite Rights & Permissions
---
## Extract
Like several prominent moral philosophers before him, such as St Augustine and St Thomas Aquinas, Kant held that it is never morally permissible to tell a lie. Although a great deal has been written on why and how he argued for this conclusion, comparatively little has been written on what, precisely, Kant considered a lie to be, and on how he differentiated between being truthful and being candid, between telling a lie and being reticent, and between telling a lie and other forms of