Jerusalem was destroyed by the Babylonians in the 6th century BCE

the verdict

SUPPORTED

the evidence backs this

Recorded sources

2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Archaeological and historical evidence strongly supports the fact that Jerusalem was destroyed by the Babylonians in the 6th century BCE, specifically in 586 BCE.

The analysis

Both retrieved papers explicitly reference the 6th century BCE Babylonian military campaigns and destruction layers in Jerusalem, such as the well-documented 586 BCE event. There is no evidence refuting this historical consensus.

Evidence for · 2

Reconstructing biblical military campaigns using geomagnetic field data.

Recorded source metadata

Vaknin Y, Shaar R, Lipschits O, Mazar A, Maeir AM, Garfinkel Y, Freud L, Faust A, Tappy RE, Kreimerman I, Ganor S, Covello-Paran K, Sergi O, Herzog Z, Arav R, Lederman Z, Münger S, Fantalkin A, Gitin S, Ben-Yosef E. Reconstructing biblical military campaigns using geomagnetic field data.. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2209117119

The paper discusses destruction layers from the 6th century BCE associated with Babylonian military campaigns in the Southern Levant.

Source citation format

See more details

More for · 1

Residue analysis evidence for wine enriched with vanilla consumed in Jerusalem on the eve of the Babylonian destruction in 586 BCE.

Recorded source metadata

Amir A, Finkelstein I, Shalev Y, Uziel J, Chalaf O, Freud L, Neumann R, Gadot Y. Residue analysis evidence for wine enriched with vanilla consumed in Jerusalem on the eve of the Babylonian destruction in 586 BCE.. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266085

The study analyzes ceramic storage jars specifically unearthed in the Babylonian destruction layer of Jerusalem dated to 586 BCE.

Source citation format

The paper trail · every fact has a biography

first checked01 Aug 2026

judged → SUPPORTED · 8001 Aug 2026

More receipts

Is it true that Phonological evolution involves regular processes of phoneme elision, vowel nasalization, and tonogenesis?Is it true that Hemangiomas are treatable with medication?Is it true that Research identifies forms of intelligence that diverge from standard IQ measures?

Random receipt →The Trust Wiki →

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: request a receipt review Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt