trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Instantaneous causation is logically possible
the verdict
CONTESTED
contested - evenly split
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 1 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Philosophical literature affirms that simultaneous causation is logically possible, while other sources emphasize local causation principles.

Evidence for · 1
2000 · cited by 0
simultaneous causation is logically possible. The reason is that, if backward causation is logically possible … since, if one holds that backward causation is logically possible, it is hard to see how one can plausibly … the same time? In short, if backward causation is logically possible, it seems very plausible to hold that
Evidence against · 1
cited by 0
"Theorem", the most important "Principle" of which is "Principle IV: Principle of local causation": "Now we come to the most important of our principles The history of the Church–Turing thesis ("thesis") involves the history of the development of the study of the nature of functions whose values are effectively calculable; or, in more modern terms, functions whose values are algorithmically computable. It is an important topic in modern mathematical theory and computer science, particularly associated with the work of Alonzo Church and Alan Turing "Now we come to the most important of our principles. In Turing's analysis the requirement that the action depended only on a bounded portion of the record was based on a human limitation. We replace this by a physical limitation which we call the principle of local causation. Its justification lies in the finite velocity of propagation of effects and signals: contemporary physics rejects the possibility of instantaneous action at a distance." In 1985 the "Thesis M" was adapted for Quantum Turing machine, resulting in a Church–Turing–Deutsch principle.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+1p:partial_opposition=1 | v55:sufficiency | v55:coherence_repaired:what=both

Everything we examined (2)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Time, Tense, and Causationreferenceno side taken
  2. History of the Church–Turing thesisreferenceno side taken
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt