trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Infinitely repeated games accurately model real-world economic interactions

the verdict
CONTESTED
contested - evenly split
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 4 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

While traditional laboratory experiments show that infinitely repeated games can successfully predict cooperative behaviors under certain controlled conditions, modern economic and game-theoretic research demonstrates that real-world interactions are frequently complicated by partner choices, institutional frameworks, and concurrent games, making standard infinitely repeated game models incomplete.

The analysis

The claim posits that infinitely repeated games accurately model real-world economic interactions. While foundational experimental literature (such as papers [0] and [2]) supports the idea that human behavior in the lab aligns with theoretical models of infinitely repeated games, newer literature highlights significant limitations. Real-world interactions involve institutional frameworks [1], partner switching dynamics [4], concurrent cross-game spillovers [5], and market anomalies where standard frequency models fail [11]. Thus, the claim is heavily contested and nuanced rather than universally supported.

The evidence we hold leans evenly split

How this was weighed

official record 3x · fact-check 2x · hedged 1x · crowd & reference 1x

  • Cooperation under the Shadow of the Future: Experimental Evi · peer-reviewed · supports · weight 2 · 2005
  • Cooperation Under the Shadow of the Future: Experimental Evi · peer-reviewed · supports · weight 1.05 · 2002
  • Optimization Incentives and Cooperation in Infinitely Repeat · peer-reviewed · supports · weight 1 · 2026
  • The social leverage effect: Institutions transform weak repu · peer-reviewed · refutes · weight 1.05 · 2024
  • Repeated games with partner choice. · peer-reviewed · refutes · weight 1.05 · 2025
  • Dynamics of cooperation in concurrent games. · peer-reviewed · refutes · weight 1.05 · 2025
  • Interaction Frequency and Cooperation in Infinitely Repeated · peer-reviewed · refutes · weight 1 · 2026
Evidence for · 3
Recorded source metadata

Pedro Dal Bó. Cooperation under the Shadow of the Future: Experimental Evidence from Infinitely Repeated Games. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282805775014434

Paper [0] provides experimental evidence that the shadow of the future in infinitely repeated games successfully reduces opportunistic behavior in line with theoretical predictions.

Evidence against · 4
Recorded source metadata

Lie-Panis J, Fitouchi L, Baumard N, André JB. The social leverage effect: Institutions transform weak reputation effects into strong incentives for cooperation.. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2408802121

Paper [1] demonstrates that real-world economic cooperation often requires institutional structures rather than mere reputation effects modeled in basic repeated games.

See more details
More for · 2
Recorded source metadata

Pedro Dal Bo. Cooperation Under the Shadow of the Future: Experimental Evidence from Infinitely Repeated Games. 2002. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.332580

Paper [2] finds strong empirical support that continuation probabilities in infinitely repeated games lead to cooperation levels that match theoretical equilibrium outcomes.

Recorded source metadata

Maximilian Andres, Juri Nithammer. Optimization Incentives and Cooperation in Infinitely Repeated Games. 2026. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6313098

Paper [10] uses laboratory data to show that optimization incentives in infinitely repeated games accurately capture behavioral cooperation under certain dilemma severities.

More against · 3
Recorded source metadata

Graser C, Fujiwara-Greve T, García J, van Veelen M. Repeated games with partner choice.. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012810

Paper [4] shows that standard repeated game models fail to capture human interaction because allowing partner choice alters cooperation dynamics significantly.

Recorded source metadata

Rossetti CSL, Hauser OP, Hilbe C. Dynamics of cooperation in concurrent games.. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-56083-7

Paper [5] finds that concurrent multi-game interactions create spillover effects that complicate simple repeated game assumptions.

Recorded source metadata

Mia Tam, Ralph-Christopher Bayer. Interaction Frequency and Cooperation in Infinitely Repeated Games. 2026. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6597967

Paper [11] presents experimental findings where higher interaction frequency in repeated market settings fails to increase collusion as standard infinitely repeated game models predict.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → CONTESTED · 3201 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt