trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Individual learning styles can be changed
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against

A longitudinal study evaluating nursing students found no significant changes in learning style scores over time, indicating that individual learning styles do not change.

Evidence for · 1
cited by 0
Learning styles and learning preferences of first and fourth semester baccalaureate degree nursing students. Learning styles and preferred learning approaches are believed to have an influence on student learning. This study compared the learning styles and learning preferences of first and fourth semester baccalaureate nursing students, as well as explored changes in learning styles and learning preferences from first to fourth semester. The two predominant learning styles of both groups of students were Abstract Random and Concrete Sequential. According to Gregorc, (1982a), these learning styles are on the opposite poles in relation to perceiving and ordering information. No significant changes were found in learning style scores from first to fourth semester. Students indicated a range of preferences for 12 learning methods. Mean scores on three methods (slide/filmstrip, short lecture with question and answer, television/movies) dropped significantly from first to fourth semester. Implications for nursing education are discussed. Published in The Journal of nursing education (1990)
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency | v55:polarity_disagreement:detail=judge=refuted:counted=for

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. PubMed: Learning styles and learning preferences of first and fourth semester baccalaureate degree nursing students.peer-reviewedno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE · 001 Aug 2026
held for human review08 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt