trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Indirect utility can be derived directly from the expenditure function by inversion.
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

An economic reference text states that the expenditure function is obtained from the indirect utility function by inversion, which contradicts the claim that indirect utility is derived from the expenditure function.

Evidence for · 1
Taxation and economic behaviour
2001 · cited by 0
just as the expenditure function is obtained from the indirect utility function by inversion; see Deaton … individuals can be decom- posed into those arising from the process of ageing and those resulting from the passage … corresponding to the expenditure function and is obtained from the direct utility function by inversion, just
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency | v55:coherence_repaired:what=both

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Taxation and economic behaviourreferenceno side taken
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt