trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Indian researchers accept to publish in predatory journals due to institutional incentives
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against

A scoping review of healthcare researchers in South Asia, including India, reports that pressure to publish is a primary reason researchers use predatory journals.

Evidence for · 1
2023 · cited by 3
AbstractPredatory journals offer the promise of prompt publication to those willing to pay the article submission or processing fee. However, these journals do not offer rigorous peer review. Studies have shown that a substantial share of corresponding authors in predatory journals come from South Asia, particularly India. This scoping review aims to assess what is known about the reasons why healthcare researchers working in South Asia publish in predatory journals. 66 reports (14 editorials, 20 letters, 5 research reports, 10 opinion articles, 14 reviews, 2 commentaries and 1 news report) were included in the data charting and analysis. The analysis of the reports identified three main reasons that made South Asian healthcare researchers publish in predatory journals: pressure to publish, lack of research support, and pseudo benefits. The review shows that predatory publishing in South Asia is a complex phenomenon. Combating predatory publications requires a holistic strategy that supersedes merely blacklisting these journals or listing criteria for journals that do meet academic standards.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (2) — 1 independent source
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Why do healthcare researchers in South Asia publish in predatory journals? A scoping reviewpeer-reviewedsame source L1no side taken
  2. Why do healthcare researchers in South Asia publish in predatory journals? A scoping reviewpeer-reviewedsame source L1no side taken
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt