trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Increasing covalent character increases colour intensity in compounds
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

An online scientific discussion provides molecular orbital theory reasoning showing that increased covalent character reduces the HOMO-LUMO gap, thereby making electronic excitation easier and increasing colour intensity in compounds.

Evidence for · 1
cited by 0
# Increasing Covalent character increases Colour intensity - Tags: inorganic-chemistry, color, periodic-trends, covalent-compounds - Score: 10 - Views: 3,573 - Answers: 1 - Asked by: Aman RU (103 rep) - Asked on: Jan 21, 2016 - Last active: Feb 1, 2017 - License: CC BY-SA 3.0 --- ## Question I observed some trends as follows:- - $\\ce{PbCl2}$ white and $\\ce{PbI2}$ yellow - $\\ce{SnCl2}$ white, $\\ce{SnCl4}$ red and $\\ce{SnI4}$ black - $\\ce{AgCl}$ white, $\\ce{AgI}$, $\\ce{AgBr}$ and $\\ce{Ag2CO3}$ yellow In all these cases as the size of anion increases ( polarisability increases) or charge on cation increases (polarising power increases) colour exhibited becomes darker.. How does increasing covalent character affect this? Or is there any other reason? --- ## Accepted Answer — Score: 11 - By: Harsh gupta (126 rep) - Answered on: Feb 1, 2017 In molecular orbital theory, as the covalent character increases the homo-lumo gap decreases, and the excitation happens more easily. Thus the colour intensity increases.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Increasing Covalent character increases Colour intensityreferenceno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE · 005 Aug 2026
held for human review08 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt