trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Immediate medical interventions can prevent an impending myocardial infarction.
the verdict
CONTESTED
contested - the weight sits with the supporting side
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 0 against

While general acute myocardial infarction treatments reduce mortality, emergency interventions for impending myocardial infarctions have shown mixed outcomes such as failure to improve in-hospital outcomes in certain aggressive strategies.

Evidence for · 2
2008 · cited by 437
Modern management of acute myocardial infarction is built on a clinical evidence base drawn from many studies undertaken over the past three decades. The evolution in clinical practice has substantially reduced mortality and morbidity associated with the condition. Key to this success is the effective integration of antithrombotic therapy combined with timely reperfusion, either primary percutaneous coronary intervention or fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and invasive investigation and revascularisation for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, underpinned by risk stratification and optimised systems of care. After the development of troponin assays for the detection of myonecrosis, the universal definition and classification of myocardial infarction now indicates the underlying pathophysiology. Additionally, an increasing appreciation of the importance of adverse events, such as bleeding, has emerged. Remaining challenges include the effective translation of this evidence to all patients with myocardial infarction, especially to those not well represented in clinical trials who remain at increased risk of adverse events, such as elderly patients and those with renal failure. On a global level, the epidemic of diabetes and obesity in the developed world and the transition from infectious diseases to cardiovascular disease in the developing world will place an increasing demand on health-care infrastructures required to deliver time-dependent and resource-intensive care. This Seminar discusses the underlying pathophysiology, evolving perspectives on diagnosis, risk stratification, and the invasive and pharmacological management of myocardial infarction.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+1p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency | v55:coherence_repaired:what=both

More for · 1
cited by 0
Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was less successful and produced more distal emboli in patients with thrombus. Emergency intervention was applied to 90% of the aggressive strategy group-it failed to improve the in-hospital outcome, but shortened hospitalization significantly. Elderly patients treated medically without angiography had the highest mortality. We concluded that intracoronary thrombus plays a major role in the pathogenesis of impending infarction, and that the majority of such patients cannot be stabilized medically. An aggressive strategy can be applied safely to impending infarction and will shorten hospitalization. Published in Japanese circulation journal (1992)
Everything we examined (2)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Acute myocardial infarction.peer-reviewedno side taken
  2. PubMed: Coronary angiographic findings and in-hospital outcome of aggressive treatment in impending myocardial infarction.peer-reviewedno side taken
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt