trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Humans exhibit a stronger cognitive and emotional reaction to negative stimuli than positive stimuli
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Scholarly reference documentation confirms the existence of the negativity bias, establishing that human cognition and general evaluations are more strongly affected by negative stimuli than equally potent positive stimuli.

Evidence for · 1
Negativity bias
cited by 0
negativity bias, also known as the negativity effect, is a cognitive bias that human cognition is relatively more affected by a negative affect than an The negativity bias, also known as the negativity effect, is a cognitive bias that human cognition is relatively more affected by a negative affect than an equally potent positive affect. The negativity bias has been investigated across different domains, including the formation of impressions and general evaluations; attention, learning, and memory; and decision-making and risk considerations. The…
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Negativity biasreferenceno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
held for human review07 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt