trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Humans can influence random event generators with their mind
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
confidence 29/100

Rigorous large-scale empirical studies and replication attempts have consistently failed to find credible evidence that humans can influence random number generators with their minds, leading to the refutation of micro-psychokinesis.

Evidence for · 1
Testing the Effects of Personality-Related Beliefs on Micro-PK
2024 · cited by 0
This study reported evidence of micro-PK effects in specific personality trait groups.
Evidence against · 2
Intentional Observer Effects on Quantum Randomness: A Bayesian Analysis Reveals Evidence Against Micro-Psychokinesis
2018 · cited by 16
This large-scale Bayesian study found strong evidence against the existence of micro-psychokinesis.
See more details
More against · 1
A Pre-Registered Test of a Correlational Micro-PK Effect: Efforts to Learn from a Failure to Replicate
2022 · cited by 0
This pre-registered replication attempt found no evidence of a micro-PK effect.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked31 Jul 2026
judged → REFUTED · 2931 Jul 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt