Humanity possesses enough nuclear weapons to wipe out all of human life

the verdict

SUPPORTED

the evidence backs this

Recorded sources

2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Multiple scholarly references and scientific discussions confirm that the combined destructive capacity of global nuclear arsenals creates a severe existential threat capable of wiping out humanity through direct effects and nuclear winter.

The analysis

Judged against statistical and reference sources.

Evidence for · 2

skeptics.stackexchange.com: Do we have enough nuclear weapons to wipe out all of ...

Recorded source metadata

skeptics.stackexchange.com: Do we have enough nuclear weapons to wipe out all of .... skeptics.stackexchange.com. https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/460/do-we-have-enough-nuclear-weapons-to-wipe-out-all-of-humanity

Affirms that global populations face very high extinction risk from combined direct and indirect consequences.

Source citation format

See more details

More for · 1

en.wikipedia.org: Nuclear holocaust

Recorded source metadata

en.wikipedia.org: Nuclear holocaust. en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_annihilation

Describes nuclear holocaust scenarios involving widespread devastation and the potential extinction of humanity.

Source citation format

The paper trail · every fact has a biography

first checked31 Jul 2026

judged → SUPPORTED · 7531 Jul 2026

More receipts

Is it true that Phonological evolution involves regular processes of phoneme elision, vowel nasalization, and tonogenesis?Is it true that Hemangiomas are treatable with medication?Is it true that Research identifies forms of intelligence that diverge from standard IQ measures?

Random receipt →The Trust Wiki →

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: request a receipt review Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt