trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Historical contemporaries blamed the Great Plague on rats and fleas.
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
0 sources for · 1 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Historical sources indicate that contemporaries of the 14th-century plague did not suspect rats and fleas as the cause.

Evidence against · 1
The Quill Reader
2000 · cited by 0
... rats and fleas , the 14th century had no suspicion , perhaps because they ... Great Mortality . Reports from the East , swollen by fearful imag- inings , told of ... disease , ignoring sanitation or visible carriers CHAPTER 7 HISTORY. This brief version of The Quill Reader contains 95 readings and images, or approximately 45 fewer than the full version. The text emphasizes critical reading and thinking skills while allowing student and instructor the opportunity to utilize the entire text in a single semester.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:refuted:single_source:for=0+0p:against=1+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. The Quill Readerreferenceno side taken
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt